HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Four in five women want PMS leave policies to become a legal requirement

-

New research finds that over four in five women are in favour of PMS leave policies becoming a legal requirement in the workplace.

Data by Yoppie, a personalised period care company, reveals that female employees are largely in favour of introducing workplace policies which would allow staff to take time off when dealing with pre-menstrual syndrome.

According to the NHS, pre-menstrual syndrome can include a wide variety of symptoms including mood swings, stomach pain or cramps, trouble sleeping and headaches.

Despite PMS affecting the majority of women in some form, around 96 per cent reported that their workplace does not have any policies in place to give staff leave.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In addition, at present, UK employment law does not dictate that women who are experiencing severe symptoms can take menstrual leave.

However, many female staff have expressed that they do wish to see these policies become a legal requirement at work.

Specifically, over four in five women (84 per cent) stated that they are in favour of introducing PMS leave policies and having this enshrined in law.

Previous research from Yoppie showed that over a quarter of women (26 per cent) were concerned that their period pains or PMS symptoms will not be considered a legitimate illness and, therefore, not a good enough reason to miss work.

Daniella Peri, Founder of Yoppie, warned that current measures do not extend far enough and could leave female staff viewed unfavourably by their employers:

The UK continues to fall short of basic employment rights by constantly ignoring the issue of menstrual leave. While those nations that already offer some form of leave might not be getting it absolutely right, they’re miles ahead of us.

Some will argue that our general sick leave policies are sufficient to cover menstrual leave, but if a woman is having to take a day or two sick leave every month compared to the average of four or five sick days a year, employers may start to look unfavourably on them.

It’s this stigma that causes many to refrain from taking time off work when PMS hits in fear that they won’t be treated equally against their male counterparts.

Sarah Evans, Partner at Constantine Law, stated:

There seem to be a few schools of thought on what PMS leave could look like, and whether it’s a good idea. Since the dawn of womankind, we have had periods.

And for many women they hurt, a lot, for a couple of days. Not everyone is bent double with the pain, but any severe pain is distracting to say the least, and we perhaps would not think twice about considering a colleague unfit for work if he/ she was in significant pain caused by something unrelated to gender.

It does not seem unreasonable that as 40 per cent of the workforce in the UK are women, who have periods, accommodation should not be made without any backlash or, as is oft quoted reservation, the risk of furthering gender stereotypes of women being weaker, less committed to careers and at greater risk of discrimination because employers may choose not to employ women if they have to “give” a couple of days a month maximum paid or other leave from time to time.

Unfortunately though, that’s the reality and until genuine equality materialises, it may be best to incorporate PMS leave as part of sick leave whilst ensuring that accumulated PMS days do not trigger disciplinary sanctions  – we already do this with disability related absence which is, or should be, discounted for disciplinary purposes.

As ever, clever and modern employers will consider what’s best for business, which usually translates into what’s best for the people who make us the money? We know that and  creating cultures of trust and respect drive efficiency and loyalty.  Our HR colleagues have the know how to create and enforce procedures to monitor absences and those who abuse leave entitlement.

The best place to start is to ask the women you employ “What do you think?”

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Chris Welford: Excited by Austerity?

Back in recession or bumping along the bottom, it...

Maggie Berry: Do women want to be leaders?

It’s hardly breaking news that, in many instances, women...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you