Female employees asked to dress ‘sexier’ for video calls

-

Female employees asked to dress 'sexier' for video calls

Women are being told by their employer to dress “sexier” for video calls showing that “discriminatory tendencies and behaviours are still rife even when women are working from home.”

Research from employment law firm Slater and Gordon, found that 35 per cent of women have experienced at least one sexist request from their boss during the lockdown, with dressing in a more provocative manner during a video call being the most common.

Anita Rai, a partner at law firm JMW Solicitors, believes it is disappointing that sexism has now found its way in to a women’s house via their employer. Ms Rai said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

We know that sexism within some workplaces does still exist and it is disappointing that this has found its way into the sanctuary of women’s homes as well.

It goes without saying that any comment which references or implies that anyone should dress “sexier” (regardless of whether it is to attract new business or look nicer for the team or to please clients) is unlawful and discriminatory, and if an employer is alerted to such remarks being made, it should immediately take action to stop it. The challenge for employers is that, even more so with agile working, they are unlikely to have visibility of discriminatory comments being made in the first place, but might well be vicariously liable for them anyway.

It seems that employers make this suggestion as it “helps to win business”,”looks nicer for the team” and “it would be more pleasing to the client”.

Nearly two-thirds (60 per cent) of women who received these comments did not report it to HR. A third (33 per cent) of women found it hard to challenge their employer when making such a request. Still, under a third (32 per cent) did say they stood up to support a female colleague when she was asked to dress “sexier”.

A quarter of women said not spending more time doing their make up before a video call could have an adverse impact on their career. Almost 40 per cent, of women say these demands are always directed towards females and not men.

Danielle Parsons, an employment lawyer at Slater and Gordon, said:

It is categorically wrong for a manager or anyone in a position of power to suggest, even politely, for a woman to be more sexually appealing in the workplace.

This is a powerful form of coercion which makes women feel as if they must adhere to the manager’s request and be more visually pleasing to be successful at their job. This is demeaning to women.

It’s extremely disappointing that we are still having these conversations, particularly during this time when women are juggling a multitude of roles from home, and may be also struggling with childcare responsibilities. This type of archaic behaviour has no place in the modern working world.

Requests of this nature are discrimination and unlawful where male counterparts aren’t treated in this way, or where such unwanted requests create a humiliating or degrading environment for women.

In order to obtain these results, Slater and Gordon, spoke to 2,000 UK employees, now working from home.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Pension Awareness Day: Plugging the advice gap

Andrew Firth, Chief Executive of Wealth Wizards, looks at auto-enrolment, pension reform and the opportunities that exist for employers and employees around advice.

Mark Onisk: How to prepare your workforce for the generative AI revolution

"Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has seen significant advancements recently, leading to impressive and diverse applications across various industries."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you