TUC urges MPs to make last gasp intervention on tribunal fees

-

workingThe TUC called on MPs to make a last-ditch effort to halt plans for employment tribunal fees.

A committee of MPs will debate this afternoon whether to allow tribunal fees to become law from this July. The TUC has warned that if the fees go ahead many of the UK’s lowest paid workers will be priced out of justice.

While the government’s plans for tribunals include a ‘remission scheme’ which will make some of the lowest paid exempt from the proposed costs, the TUC believes that a substantial proportion of workers who are on the minimum wage (NMW) will still be required to pay fees of up to £345 to take a case to an employment tribunal.

This is because the test for the ability to pay will be based on household income rather than an individual’s earnings. This assumes that all household income is shared equally between a couple. The TUC does not agree that a woman’s capacity to enforce her individual rights should depend on her partner’s consent.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Fees proposed for tribunals have also been set disproportionately high in order to deter many people from taking valid claims to tribunal, says the TUC. For example, an individual seeking to recover unpaid wages or holiday pay from their employer will be required to pay upfront fees of up to £390 for their case to be decided.

Individuals seeking to challenge discrimination at work will be required to pay up to £1,200 for their case to be decided.

This means that some individuals will be required to pay upfront fees which are higher than the value of their claim, says the TUC.

TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: ‘Introducing tribunal fees will serve only to embolden rogue employers, who will be able to mistreat staff without fear of sanction.

‘Regardless of what ministers say this is not about cutting red tape for businesses. It is yet another attack on workers’ employment rights and will result in victims being deterred from making genuine claims.

‘Erecting punitive financial barriers is not our idea of fairness. The government’s remission scheme to protect the lowest paid is woefully inadequate and many of the UK’s most vulnerable workers will simply be priced out of justice.’

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Will Plummer: Staff Shortages Present Security Risks – Cyber and Physical

"Staffing shortages are a big security risk...There are nearly 600,000 unfilled cybersecurity positions."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you