HRreview Header

Revised code of practice on settlement agreements published

-

mediationACAS has published its response to the consultation on its settlement agreements code of practice, which contains the final version of the Code of Settlement Agreements.

The next step will be for the Code to be put before Parliament so it can be brought into effect on a date to yet to be confirmed by Ministers; however the Government has already indicated its intention to bring the new Code and the new provisions on settlement agreements into effect by the summer of 2013.

The key points include:

  • The Code outlines what is meant by without prejudice.
  • The Code concentrates on the significance of section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which introduces confidentiality provisions associated with negotiations that take place to reach such agreements (commonly referred to as Protected Conversations or pre-termination negotiations).
  • Protected Conversations can be treated as confidential even where there is no current employment dispute.
  • Protected Conversations only extend to normal unfair dismissal claims (express and constructive) but not to automatic unfair dismissal claims, for example where the dismissal is because of whistleblowing or union membership or asserting a statutory right.
  • Protection does not extend to other claims such as discrimination.
  • Confidentiality can be lost if there’s ‘improper conduct’. In other words the conversation / communication would become admissible in an unfair dismissal Employment Tribunal hearing.
  • The initial discussion / offer can be oral (and does not have to be in writing).
  • A meeting may take place to discuss the offer (note there is no requirement for a meeting, as the offer could be put in writing only).
  • Whilst not a legal requirement, the Code says ’employers should allow employees to be accompanied at the meeting by a work colleague, trade union official or trade union representative’.
  • An employee must be given a reasonable period of time to consider the proposed settlement agreement.  As a general rule, a minimum period of ten calendar days should be allowed to consider the proposed formal written terms of a settlement agreement and to receive independent advice, unless the parties agree otherwise (paragraph 12 of the Code).
  • Guidance on what constitutes improper behaviour is contained in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the Settlement Agreement Code.

This publication of the revised final version of the code follows an Acas consultation, which ran from 12 February to 9 April 2013.

Latest news

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.
- Advertisement -

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

UK loses ground in global remote work rankings

Connectivity gaps across the UK risk weakening the country’s appeal to remote workers and internationally mobile talent.

Must read

Kate Palmer: Managing resentment in the workplace as more businesses re-open

"As businesses start to reopen, employers must keep on the lookout for issues that could arise amongst staff after being reunited for some time."

Alvaro Gonzales and Eduardo J. Vinales: Transferring senior executives to Mexico and Argentina

Alvaro Gonzalez and Eduardo J. Vinales address the legal and HR issues involved when multi-national companies transfer senior executives to Mexico and Argentina.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you