Revised code of practice on settlement agreements published

-

mediationACAS has published its response to the consultation on its settlement agreements code of practice, which contains the final version of the Code of Settlement Agreements.

The next step will be for the Code to be put before Parliament so it can be brought into effect on a date to yet to be confirmed by Ministers; however the Government has already indicated its intention to bring the new Code and the new provisions on settlement agreements into effect by the summer of 2013.

The key points include:

  • The Code outlines what is meant by without prejudice.
  • The Code concentrates on the significance of section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which introduces confidentiality provisions associated with negotiations that take place to reach such agreements (commonly referred to as Protected Conversations or pre-termination negotiations).
  • Protected Conversations can be treated as confidential even where there is no current employment dispute.
  • Protected Conversations only extend to normal unfair dismissal claims (express and constructive) but not to automatic unfair dismissal claims, for example where the dismissal is because of whistleblowing or union membership or asserting a statutory right.
  • Protection does not extend to other claims such as discrimination.
  • Confidentiality can be lost if there’s ‘improper conduct’. In other words the conversation / communication would become admissible in an unfair dismissal Employment Tribunal hearing.
  • The initial discussion / offer can be oral (and does not have to be in writing).
  • A meeting may take place to discuss the offer (note there is no requirement for a meeting, as the offer could be put in writing only).
  • Whilst not a legal requirement, the Code says ’employers should allow employees to be accompanied at the meeting by a work colleague, trade union official or trade union representative’.
  • An employee must be given a reasonable period of time to consider the proposed settlement agreement.  As a general rule, a minimum period of ten calendar days should be allowed to consider the proposed formal written terms of a settlement agreement and to receive independent advice, unless the parties agree otherwise (paragraph 12 of the Code).
  • Guidance on what constitutes improper behaviour is contained in paragraphs 17 and 18 of the Settlement Agreement Code.

This publication of the revised final version of the code follows an Acas consultation, which ran from 12 February to 9 April 2013.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Simon Lyle: HR professionals are set to work 22 days overtime due to redundancies

"Every ‘simple’ redundancy typically cost HR professionals 7¼ hours of work."

Grace Mole: Vaccinations: Keeping your employees safe – and onside

"While no-nonsense work policies on the lines of 'no jab, no' job' approach may be tempting for some bosses, the issue is far from straightforward."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you