Parents and carers call for overhaul of employment support

-

In a powerful display of unity, more than 100 parents and carers have joined forces to demand significant changes to the government’s benefits system, urging the scrapping of punitive measures and a stronger focus on breaking down barriers to employment.

Under the banner of the “Changing Realities” project, this initiative is funded by the abrdn Financial Fairness Trust.

It brings together individuals who have lived experience with the benefits system, collaborating with the University of York and the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) to highlight system flaws and propose viable solutions.

Voices from the affected community have expressed their frustration with the current state of affairs. One single parent, Herbie, dismissed the notion that Universal Credit effectively assists people into better employment, calling it “nonsense.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Another parent, Precious D, shared her personal struggles, stating that she did not receive any meaningful employment support.

The lack of effective support is a common concern

A common concern voiced by claimants was the lack of effective support from Work Coaches. Dotty G, a single parent, revealed her frustration with the inconsistency of assistance, saying, “I don’t believe that Work Coaches understand our individual circumstances, because it seems as if I see a different Work Coach whenever I have an appointment.”

This criticism comes despite the government’s initial promise that Universal Credit would pave the way for more individuals to find and progress in suitable employment.

Rather than doubling down on punitive measures within the existing system, the group is advocating for a comprehensive overhaul of the benefits framework that offers genuine support to those seeking employment.

Their proposed recommendations include:

  1. Improving the adequacy of the social security system by increasing all benefits, eliminating the five-week wait for Universal Credit, and abolishing the two-child limit and the benefit cap.
  2. Transforming Universal Credit to make it more adaptable by exploring flexible assessment periods, incentivizing work by expanding work allowances, and providing financial assistance to claimants in their job search.
  3. Shifting the focus from sanctions to substantial support and mentorship, removing the fear of punitive measures.
  4. Establishing consistent case workers to provide regular, reliable points of contact and personalized assistance.
  5. Creating a statement of rights for claimants to balance the relationship between rights and responsibilities.
  6. Enhancing access to skills training while taking individual skills and career aspirations into consideration.

Melanie Wilkes, associate director at IPPR, emphasized that while not everyone can work, there are millions of people let down by the current benefits system who genuinely want to find employment or work more hours. She urged the government to reevaluate its approach to employment support if it aims to genuinely help people advance their careers.

Dr. Ruth Patrick, a senior lecturer at the University of York, stressed the urgent need to reform the failing employment support system, moving away from conditionality and sanctions. She highlighted the importance of prioritizing long-term, meaningful employment for individuals based on their unique circumstances and expertise, arguing that the recommendations put forth by claimants themselves could serve as a promising starting point in rebuilding an inclusive and effective employment support system for everyone.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Lauren Webb: Empowering women to lead the way in analytics and AI

Women remain wildly underrepresented in technical and digital leadership, making up just 22% of the UK’s AI talent. It’s jarring.

Employers urged to balance flexibility and fairness as England’s World Cup campaign begins

Employment lawyers are advising organisations to plan ahead for leave requests and workplace flexibility as the 2026 FIFA World Cup gets under way.

Amy Coleman on uncertainty and pressure at work

“Many of you shared feelings of uncertainty and pressure as the work evolves.”

Workers fear favouritism is driving workplace rewards and recognition

Many UK employees believe workplace rewards are influenced by favouritism, with women significantly less likely to view recognition as fair.
- Advertisement -

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Must read

Nicola Smith: The rise of women reaching senior management.

I don’t think of myself either as a feminist...

Prithvi Shergill: Make learning a game – three steps to success

The continued march of digital communications is heralding the emergence of a nation of digital natives. Despite belonging to different cultures, they speak a similar language and are comfortable communicating both physically or virtually. In this environment, creative friction is being encouraged to solve problems and deal with risk at the same time.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you