Paralegal awarded over £100,000 in employment tribunal victory against law firm

-

A paralegal who abandoned her lifelong ambition of becoming a solicitor has been awarded over £100,000 by an employment tribunal after successfully bringing claims of discrimination and unfair dismissal against her former employer.

Ms. F. Kaiser, 48, secured a significant victory last year in her legal battle against Khans Solicitors, an Ilford-based law firm.

The tribunal upheld her claims of disability and sex discrimination, breach of contract, and automatic unfair dismissal. Additionally, the tribunal found that Khans Solicitors failed to provide her with written terms of employment and itemised pay slips, further compounding the firm’s breaches of employment law.

Kaiser joined Khans Solicitors in 2019, with high hopes of qualifying as a solicitor. However, her aspirations were derailed when she encountered difficulties related to her employment. According to employment judge Jones, Kaiser was “honest and upfront” about a personal issue that could potentially impact her admission to the solicitor’s roll. She requested that the firm’s partners delay signing a training contract until the matter was resolved, to which they initially agreed.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Despite this agreement, the firm employed Kaiser as a caseworker at the national minimum wage of £8.21 per hour for a 35-hour work week, but the tribunal found that she was never paid those wages, even though she worked in excess of the required hours.

The tribunal’s judgment highlighted the significant emotional and psychological toll the experience had on Kaiser. “The claimant has had her confidence damaged as a result of the way she was treated by the respondent,” the judgment noted. “In contrast to how she felt when she first began working for the respondent, she does not believe that she will qualify now, although we hope that she will, after sufficient time has passed.”

The right to minimum wage

In addressing the unfair dismissal claim, Judge Jones emphasised that Kaiser was dismissed for asserting her right to be paid the national minimum wage. Despite her advocacy, the tribunal found that she was frequently underpaid or not paid at all.

Kaiser was awarded £25,000 for injury to feelings, with the judge noting that she had “trusted” the firm and was eager to qualify as a solicitor, a goal the firm had promised to support by certifying the quality and breadth of her work. Despite her disabilities and the resulting pain, Kaiser worked diligently, often going above and beyond by working weekends and late nights in the hope of achieving her goal.

However, the tribunal found that the discrimination and subsequent dismissal had a severe impact on Kaiser’s mental health, ultimately leading her to give up her dream of becoming a solicitor.

Khans Solicitors has been ordered to pay the paralegal a total of £105,420.64 in damages and £3,600 in costs.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Maggie Berry: Creating a supportive environment for women in the workplace

There’s a lot of talk about creating the right...

Margaret Anne Clark: Test case needed to shine light on tribunal grey area

Head of employment law at specialist employment law firm Law At Work, Margaret Anne Clark discusses the impact of the abolition of tribunal fees.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you