Government wins minimum wage challenge

-

The Government has fought off a legal challenge by the Cordant Group, a company with a number of subsidiaries which provide manpower staffing services in the security, cleaning and recruitment sectors to major companies and public sector organizations throughout the UK and Eire.

A High Court judge in London rejected the Cordant Groups criticism of a change in the rules which determine what should count as forming part of an employee’s remuneration.

Under new national minimum wage amendements leglistaions which came into effect on the 1st of January, mean that tax-free expenses such as travel costs, subsistence and accommodation cost paid to a worker to cover their travel from home to a temporary workplace will no longer count towards national minimum wage pay.

High Court Judge Mr Kenneth Parker dismissed the challenge saying the amendment made things clearer for employees and employers. He said it “will materially enhance the ability of both employer and low-paid employee to recognise whether or not they are paying and receiving at least the minimum wage prescribed by law”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In his ruling the judge said Cordant “employs about 30,000 employees,many of them in unskilled jobs that are paid at or near the national minimum wage, and has for several years operated arrangements that will be affected by the challenged legislative change”.

In rejecting permission to appeal, the judge said he had reached the “firm conclusion at the end of the day that this challenge was an attack on the economic merits of regulatory reform affecting the labour market in the guise of a common law and legal equality case”.

He added: “I can discern no arguable basis why this amendment, which in what I have found to be the lawful conclusion of the Secretary of State brings substantial benefit to low paid workers, and is in the public interest, should not be implemented, as planned and announced, on January 1 2011.””s 

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Nelson Sivalingam: Skills over status – why CEOs don’t care about job titles

Perhaps it’s disingenuous to say that job titles don’t matter. But if the past decade taught us anything, it’s that we’re in a time of change.

Claire England: Social mobility, it’s time for employers to up their game

"People from lower socio-economic backgrounds often face barriers to enter a number of professions."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you