Government wins minimum wage challenge

-

The Government has fought off a legal challenge by the Cordant Group, a company with a number of subsidiaries which provide manpower staffing services in the security, cleaning and recruitment sectors to major companies and public sector organizations throughout the UK and Eire.

A High Court judge in London rejected the Cordant Groups criticism of a change in the rules which determine what should count as forming part of an employee’s remuneration.

Under new national minimum wage amendements leglistaions which came into effect on the 1st of January, mean that tax-free expenses such as travel costs, subsistence and accommodation cost paid to a worker to cover their travel from home to a temporary workplace will no longer count towards national minimum wage pay.

High Court Judge Mr Kenneth Parker dismissed the challenge saying the amendment made things clearer for employees and employers. He said it “will materially enhance the ability of both employer and low-paid employee to recognise whether or not they are paying and receiving at least the minimum wage prescribed by law”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In his ruling the judge said Cordant “employs about 30,000 employees,many of them in unskilled jobs that are paid at or near the national minimum wage, and has for several years operated arrangements that will be affected by the challenged legislative change”.

In rejecting permission to appeal, the judge said he had reached the “firm conclusion at the end of the day that this challenge was an attack on the economic merits of regulatory reform affecting the labour market in the guise of a common law and legal equality case”.

He added: “I can discern no arguable basis why this amendment, which in what I have found to be the lawful conclusion of the Secretary of State brings substantial benefit to low paid workers, and is in the public interest, should not be implemented, as planned and announced, on January 1 2011.””s 

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Chris Welford: Derailment

Derailment is an interesting word, conjuring up images of...

Maggie Berry: Returning to work – a mother’s choice

There are many issues for mothers to consider when...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you