Government wins minimum wage challenge

-

The Government has fought off a legal challenge by the Cordant Group, a company with a number of subsidiaries which provide manpower staffing services in the security, cleaning and recruitment sectors to major companies and public sector organizations throughout the UK and Eire.

A High Court judge in London rejected the Cordant Groups criticism of a change in the rules which determine what should count as forming part of an employee’s remuneration.

Under new national minimum wage amendements leglistaions which came into effect on the 1st of January, mean that tax-free expenses such as travel costs, subsistence and accommodation cost paid to a worker to cover their travel from home to a temporary workplace will no longer count towards national minimum wage pay.

High Court Judge Mr Kenneth Parker dismissed the challenge saying the amendment made things clearer for employees and employers. He said it “will materially enhance the ability of both employer and low-paid employee to recognise whether or not they are paying and receiving at least the minimum wage prescribed by law”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In his ruling the judge said Cordant “employs about 30,000 employees,many of them in unskilled jobs that are paid at or near the national minimum wage, and has for several years operated arrangements that will be affected by the challenged legislative change”.

In rejecting permission to appeal, the judge said he had reached the “firm conclusion at the end of the day that this challenge was an attack on the economic merits of regulatory reform affecting the labour market in the guise of a common law and legal equality case”.

He added: “I can discern no arguable basis why this amendment, which in what I have found to be the lawful conclusion of the Secretary of State brings substantial benefit to low paid workers, and is in the public interest, should not be implemented, as planned and announced, on January 1 2011.””s 

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Should employers ban office romances in light of the Me Too movement?

Legally, there are no laws preventing office romances. How can employers determine how they are going to respond to them?

Iain Chadwick: 24 months later…How auto-enrolment shapes the workplace pension revolution

Two years since the first companies reached their staging dates, auto-enrolment continues to throw up a lot of new challenges to HR and pensions professionals.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you