Government wins minimum wage challenge

-

The Government has fought off a legal challenge by the Cordant Group, a company with a number of subsidiaries which provide manpower staffing services in the security, cleaning and recruitment sectors to major companies and public sector organizations throughout the UK and Eire.

A High Court judge in London rejected the Cordant Groups criticism of a change in the rules which determine what should count as forming part of an employee’s remuneration.

Under new national minimum wage amendements leglistaions which came into effect on the 1st of January, mean that tax-free expenses such as travel costs, subsistence and accommodation cost paid to a worker to cover their travel from home to a temporary workplace will no longer count towards national minimum wage pay.

High Court Judge Mr Kenneth Parker dismissed the challenge saying the amendment made things clearer for employees and employers. He said it “will materially enhance the ability of both employer and low-paid employee to recognise whether or not they are paying and receiving at least the minimum wage prescribed by law”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In his ruling the judge said Cordant “employs about 30,000 employees,many of them in unskilled jobs that are paid at or near the national minimum wage, and has for several years operated arrangements that will be affected by the challenged legislative change”.

In rejecting permission to appeal, the judge said he had reached the “firm conclusion at the end of the day that this challenge was an attack on the economic merits of regulatory reform affecting the labour market in the guise of a common law and legal equality case”.

He added: “I can discern no arguable basis why this amendment, which in what I have found to be the lawful conclusion of the Secretary of State brings substantial benefit to low paid workers, and is in the public interest, should not be implemented, as planned and announced, on January 1 2011.””s 

Latest news

England’s overnight World Cup clash and 5am pub opening prompt CIPD advice

The CIPD is urging organisations to agree any flexibility before England's 1am World Cup last-16 tie to help minimise disruption at the start of the working week.

Russell Cowley: Gen Z – rebuilding workplace culture, break by break

Gen Z workers are taking proper breaks and in doing so, they may be fixing something the rest of us broke.

Fit for Work: Weekend warrior? You can still reap the health benefits

Weekend exercise can still improve long-term health, even for people who struggle to fit physical activity into the working week.

Superdry co-founder’s victim warns workplace power can silence abuse victims

A survivor's account raises questions about speaking-up cultures and accountability in organisations.
- Advertisement -

UK’s always-on work culture ‘driving employee burnout’

Nearly half of UK workers say they end most working days mentally exhausted as rising workplace pressure leaves employees and managers struggling to switch off.

Andrew Murray on why no two days look alike

A people development leader shares how travel, training and a passion for helping others shape a working day with little room for routine.

Must read

Paul Graham: Why apprenticeships are a must-have for our business 

"Apprenticeships are not just about learning a profession; they are about developing skills for life. I know this is the theme for this year’s National Apprenticeship Week - and rightly so!"

Alan Price: Adam or Mohamed, discrimination in the workplace

Peninsula Employment Law Director Alan Price comments on how can employers ensure there is no religious discrimination in the workplace
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you