Catholic police officer claims he was bullied by his Protestant boss

-

shutterstock_74394085

A Roman Catholic Detective Inspector is bringing a claim against Scotland Yard for ‘religious belief, race and disability discrimination’, reports the Daily Mail.

The claimant, DI Paul Armstrong, who is a Roman Catholic, claims his Ulster Protestant boss, DCI Mark Roycroft, unfairly criticised him in an annual appraisal and that it was motivated by ‘sectarian bias’. Mr Armstrong also claims that Mr Roycroft bullied and harassed him because of his religious background.

In the tribunal papers, Mr Armstrong claims the problems started in June 2007 at Charing Cross Police Station. He says: ‘I was subjected to bullying and harassment by my then line manager, DCI Mark Roycroft [an Ulster protestant] who prejudiced me unfairly in my annual appraisal; he made comments that were untrue and misleading, which I sincerely believe were motivated by his sectarian bias towards Irish Catholics. This is direct discrimination.’

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

He goes on to say: “The actions of DCI Roycroft towards me and his damaging of my character … have effectively ruined what was, up until then, a very successful career.” He alleges he was excluded from CID management meetings, not supported for promotion and overlooked for other new postings.

However, former colleagues of Mr Roycroft, described him as an officer of high integrity and said there was no substance to Mr Armstrong’s claims. They asserted that Mr Roycroft was a highly respected detective who had led a number of successful investigations in the Met.

Scotland Yard chiefs are still debating whether to contest Mr Armstrong’s ‘highly unusual’ claim against the force.

Mr Armstrong’s allegations are due to be further outlined at the Central London Employment tribunal in September.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Alan Price: How to hire a millennial

Expert advice on how to lure millennials into your organisation

Christine Husbands: Are All Mental Health Support Services fit for purpose?

Most companies have at least one mental health support service in place for their employees, writes Christine Husbands, but employers need to ask "are our mental health support services fit for purpose?"  
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you