Bosses ‘not prepared to hire women wanting to start families’

-

Many employers in the UK are not prepared to hire female job candidates if they know they intend to start a family, according to new research.

Figures produced by the Employment Law Advisory Services (ELAS) reveal that 76 per cent of bosses admitted that they would not take on a new recruit if they were aware they hoped to fall pregnant within six months of taking on the role.

Additionally, it was discovered that over half of the managers questioned assess the chances of a member of staff becoming pregnant prior to employing them.

"It is a very dangerous area and you simply cannot ask the question about plans for a family in an interview. For many bosses it is down to the bottom line – a pregnant member of staff will cost money. However, a visit to a tribunal can be even more costly," warned Peter Mooney, head of consultancy at ELAS.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Research published earlier this month by the Fawcett Society suggested that as many as 30,000 women lose their jobs each year in the UK as a result of being pregnant.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Charlie Thompson: ‘Us’ and ‘them’ – the unmentioned side effects of COVID-19 on the workplace

"A significant change which is happening in slow motion is a creeping tendency towards an “us and them” culture forming in some workplaces".

Richard Seabrook: Understanding how AI can improve efficiencies and minimise risks in the world of HR

The recent media interest about artificial intelligence (AI) has been inescapable. Contrary to popular belief, AI is not just about machine robotics and drones. Instead, it refers to the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence. But how might this type of technology help HR professionals?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you