The recession of 2008-9 is sometimes referred to as a ‘mancession’ because men were hit relatively hard when it came to jobs. Women accounted for only around a fifth of the fall in employment during the recession and only around a third of the rise in unemployment. But there is a widespread expectation that the opposite will occur in the wake of ongoing large scale public sector downsizing, given that two-thirds of public sector workers are women, and weak consumer demand in private sector services, especially retail, that employ lots of women in part-time jobs.
However, as the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) highlights today in its latest Work Audit, official statistics show that while men benefited most during the initial post-recession jobs recovery in 2010, it’s been tough for both sexes in the 2011 jobs market and women have actually fared slightly better than men despite public sector cutbacks and a sharp fall in part-time employment:
• The female unemployment rate has increased steadily from 6.5% to 7.5% since the end of the recession, with the number of unemployed women reaching a record level of 1.09 million, but in 2011 has fallen very slightly relative to that of men.
• The gap between the male and female unemployment rate narrowed from 2.5 percentage points to 1.4 percentage points in the first year following the recession but has since widened again to 1.5 percentage points as economic growth has stagnated, with the male unemployment rate (now at 9%) rising back to where it was at the end of the recession.
• The number of women in work has fallen steadily throughout 2011 but the number of men in work has fallen even more, with the result that by the third quarter of 2011 the number of women in work was still 32,000 higher than at the end of 2010 while the number of men in work was 86,000 lower. Men, not women, have been hit hardest by the substantial loss of part-time jobs in 2011.
• There has been a comparable rise in male and female unemployment in 2011 but for men this was dampened by a fall in the number of men participating in the labour market, whereas for women unemployment has been raised because more women have entered the labour market to look for jobs.
Since the figures only reflect those people who actually sign on – and for anyone with a partner at home who earns a reasonable pay, that only gives 6 months of Jobeseeker’s allowance, I wonder just how much the figures are skewed by the fact a lot of people drop out of the figures after 6 months. I wonder just how many women have gone back into the home until they can find a new job – “the invisible unemployed”.
A very interesting article. We carried out our own investigation into the employment rate differences between men and women earlier this year. At the beginning of 2011, when the economy was looking a little more optimistic than it is now, we found that substanially more women than men returned to work. However both our findings and the figures stated in the above article need to be put in context to the actual number of employed men and women. If you look at these figures, you will see that almost twice as many men as women are currently working.
Therefore, the changes in the labour market being described above are most likely attributed to the effectsA very interesting article. We carried out our own investigation into the employment rate differences between men and women earlier this year. At the beginning of 2011, when the economy was looking a little more optimistic than it is now, we found that substantially more women than men returned to work. However, both our findings and the figures stated in the above article need to be put in context to the actual number of employed men and women. If you look at these figures, you will see that almost twice as many men as women are currently working.
Therefore, the changes in the labour market being described above are most likely attributed to the effects of equal-rights employment law coming into action.
of equal-rights employment law coming into action.
A very interesting article. We carried out our own investigation into the employment rate differences between men and women earlier this year. At the beginning of 2011, when the economy was looking a little more optimistic than it is now, we found that substantially more women than men returned to work. However, both our findings and the figures stated in the above article need to be put in context to the actual number of employed men and women. If you look at these figures, you will see that almost twice as many men as women are currently working.
Therefore, the changes in the labour market being described above are most likely attributed to the effects of equal-rights employment law coming into action.