HRreview Header

Pretty female professionals penalised more by HR

HR professionals tend to discriminate against attractive female job applicants who include a photo of themselves, but favour good looking men who do the same, new research has revealed.

A study, by the Royal Economic Society, looking at “beauty” bias among recruiters found that good looking women who send a picture in with their job application were invited for fewer interviews than plainer candidates or people who do not include a picture.

But, conversely, handsome men who send a photo in with their CV were more likely to be called for interview than less attractive men.

Researchers said the study “proves that there is a double standard between good looks as a positive factor in men versus women”.

They also found that recruiters are more likely to be women in their 20s who are “more likely to be jealous when confronted with an attractive woman in the workplace but not an attractive man,” leading to the double standard results.

The findings contradict current psychology and organisational behaviour research on beauty, which associates attractiveness, for men and women, with almost every conceivable positive trait and disposition, researchers said.

Share

Latest News

Latest Analysis

Related Articles

AI regret: over half of firms say their redundancies were ‘a mistake’

More than half of businesses that made employees redundant due to AI deployment now admit those decisions were poorly thought-out.

Workers with caring responsibilities risk pension shortfall, research shows

Nearly half of working carers aged 60 to 65 have no private pension savings. Among those who do, carers have less saved than the UK average.

One in four UK workers fear losing their jobs to AI

Just over a quarter of workers in Britain are worried that artificial intelligence (AI) will lead to job losses, according to a new survey.

Woman unfairly dismissed from Marks & Spencer after disclosing pregnancy, tribunal rules

A woman who worked at Marks & Spencer’s Watford branch was unfairly dismissed after informing her employer of her pregnancy, an employment tribunal has ruled.