Men working from home face promotion setback, study reveals

-

In a recent study conducted by the University of Warsaw, it has been revealed that men who work entirely from home are disproportionately overlooked for promotions and pay rises compared to their female counterparts in similar remote positions.

The findings shed light on the persistent challenges faced by remote male workers, particularly in companies with demanding corporate cultures.

The study, which surveyed 937 UK managers, indicated that bosses were 15 percent less likely to promote men who worked remotely full-time, and 10 percent less likely to increase their pay, compared to those who were office-based.

This disparity was even more pronounced in organisations with rigorous work cultures, where male remote workers faced a staggering 30 percent decrease in promotion likelihood and a 19 percent decrease in pay rise likelihood.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Lead researcher Agnieszka Kasperska highlighted the significant gender gap in remote work penalties, emphasising that the consequences for men were notably larger. She noted that while both male and female remote workers experience career setbacks, the impact on men is more severe.

Also, the study revealed that the disparity is less prevalent in companies with supportive working environments that prioritise flexibility and work-life balance. In such organisations, there was no discernible penalty for employees opting to work remotely.

What’s changed since the pandemic?

Despite these findings, there has been a disproportionate return of men to office settings since the pandemic, raising concerns about the stress and challenges faced by women, low-income workers, and individuals living alone who continue to work remotely. The report highlighted existing gender disparities in part-time roles, with a significantly higher percentage of women occupying such positions compared to men.

The debate surrounding remote work continues to intensify, with proponents advocating for its positive impact on employee well-being and work-life balance, while critics argue that it may hamper productivity and exacerbate loneliness.

Additionally, conflicting evidence on the health implications of remote work has emerged, with studies suggesting both positive and negative outcomes. While remote workers may experience lower blood pressure compared to office counterparts, they are also more prone to habits such as smoking, snacking, and weight gain.

In response to these dynamics, some companies have begun implementing stricter policies to ensure office attendance. Bank of America, for instance, issued warnings to staff failing to meet minimum office attendance requirements, while others like HS2 contractor Laing O’Rourke have mandated full-time office work, citing concerns over business continuity and employee engagement.

As the remote work landscape continues to evolve, addressing the disparities faced by male remote workers and fostering inclusive workplace practices remain critical challenges for organisations striving for equitable employment opportunities.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

5 myths about digital recruitment

The fast-changing world of apps, social media, video technologies, games and VR is having a dramatic impact on HR processes.  How can we use digital recruitment to our advantage?

Fiona Young: How EAs are redefining their roles with AI & automation

Executive Assistants (EAs) are on the brink of a huge shift, as AI is rewriting the rulebook for what it means to be an EA.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you