Gender pay gap narrows for FTSE 100 board directors, but progress remains slow

-

A new report from Fox & Partners, the employment and partnership law specialists, reveals that the gender pay gap for FTSE 100 board directors has narrowed in 2022, albeit at a sluggish pace.

Despite the reduction, women still face a substantial pay disparity, with the average pay for female directors at £309,000, representing just 30 percent of the average pay for their male counterparts, who earn an average of £1.04 million.

The research shows that over the past year, the gender pay gap in the FTSE 100 decreased from 74 percent in 2021 to 70 percent in 2022.

This narrowing was primarily driven by a more substantial increase in pay for women directors compared to their male counterparts. The average pay for female board directors rose by 26 in 2022, from £245,525 in 2021 to £308,984, while male director’s average pay increased by 11 percent to £1.04 million in 2022, up from £935,235 in 2021.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Despite these improvements, Catriona Watt, a Partner at Fox & Partners, emphasises that the pay gap persists because the majority of women board directors occupy lower-paid non-executive roles.

A staggering 91 percent of the 426 female directors within FTSE 100 companies serve in non-executive positions, which generally have less day-to-day authority.

What about the earnings gap?

This discrepancy in roles is reflected in the earnings gap, with female executive directors earning more than 20 times the average pay for female non-executive directors. On average, male executive directors earn over 18 times the average pay of male non-executive directors.

The data highlights that male directors continue to receive significantly higher compensation than their female counterparts, both in executive and non-executive roles. Male non-executives are paid 52 percent more than their female counterparts, in part due to a higher share of more senior non-exec roles, such as “Chairman.” Male executives earn 38 percent more than female executives.

Catriona Watt acknowledges the progress but points out the continuing substantial gender pay gap among directors. She stressed that for meaningful change to take place, businesses must invest in programs aimed at preparing women for the most senior executive positions. This includes providing access to projects that enhance their experience, addressing potential gaps, and ensuring transparency in promotion and progression requirements.

DE&I and top leadership

Watt also advises companies to foster a culture of diversity and inclusion, with top leadership promoting this culture. It is essential to review internal policies, including family and flexible working-related policies, to align with the desired corporate culture.

Furthermore, examining available data on gender disparities in businesses is crucial to identifying systemic issues. To support women’s progression to the highest positions in the firm, companies should provide more networking, mentoring, and championing opportunities. Regular reviews of how work is allocated can support this progression.

Watt suggests that appointing a board member responsible for advancing women’s opportunities within the organisation can make gender equity a priority and help identify and address any barriers to progression.

Setting targets for senior leaders to promote female opportunities can incentivise lasting change and help women succeed in the highest positions within the company.

While progress has been made, the gender pay gap among FTSE 100 board directors remains a pressing issue. Addressing the root causes of this disparity and implementing comprehensive strategies for change are essential for achieving true gender equality in the corporate world.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

England’s overnight World Cup clash and 5am pub opening prompt CIPD advice

The CIPD is urging organisations to agree any flexibility before England's 1am World Cup last-16 tie to help minimise disruption at the start of the working week.

Russell Cowley: Gen Z – rebuilding workplace culture, break by break

Gen Z workers are taking proper breaks and in doing so, they may be fixing something the rest of us broke.

Fit for Work: Weekend warrior? You can still reap the health benefits

Weekend exercise can still improve long-term health, even for people who struggle to fit physical activity into the working week.

Superdry co-founder’s victim warns workplace power can silence abuse victims

A survivor's account raises questions about speaking-up cultures and accountability in organisations.
- Advertisement -

UK’s always-on work culture ‘driving employee burnout’

Nearly half of UK workers say they end most working days mentally exhausted as rising workplace pressure leaves employees and managers struggling to switch off.

Andrew Murray on why no two days look alike

A people development leader shares how travel, training and a passion for helping others shape a working day with little room for routine.

Must read

James Bywater: How to create a globally-consistent assessment process

Multinational employers recognise the benefits of standardising core operations and processes across their different countries. IT, finance and marketing were the first to cross national borders. Now, it’s HR’s turn, as global organisations are looking to achieve savings and increase efficiency by implementing more consistent HR processes around the world, including recruitment and assessment.

Peter Linas: How recruiters can engage millennials and post-millennials

What are the reasons why millennials and post-millennials are seemingly the most challenging to recruit? Peter Linas argues that, despite the common stereotype that people this age would be easier to reach through their use of tech, this could be simultaneously part of the problem.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you