Workers in open plan offices took 70% more sick days last year than home-workers

-

shutterstock_132012518

Despite being the most common working environment, open plan offices may actually be detrimental to employee health, wellbeing and productivity, according to recent Canada Life Group Insurance research.

When asked to rank how easy it is to be healthy and productive in their working environment, employees in open plan offices gave an average score of 6.1 and 6.5 out of ten respectively. In comparison, employees who work mostly from home gave scores of 8.1 for health and 7.7 for productivity.

While employees who work from home only took an average of 1.8 sick days last year, workers in open plan offices took over 70% more (3.1 days). Those working in an open plan office are also almost six times more likely than home workers to believe their working environment promotes stress (28% vs 5%), with previous research demonstrating workplace stress can significantly increase absence levels.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Health and wellbeing hampered by office environment

Perhaps unsurprisingly given the proximity of other colleagues, staff who work in open plan offices are some of the most likely to say that illness spreads quickly in their organisation (34%), second only to teachers in classroom environments (47%). Employees who work from home are virtually unaffected by this problem: only 1% agreed illness spreads quickly where they work.

Home workers are most likely to agree that their working environment promotes stress-free and calm conditions (52%), with those in a private office (19%) coming a distant second. In contrast, only 12% of those in open plan offices agree with this, with over a quarter (28%) saying that it actively creates a stressful working environment versus 5% of home workers.

Despite the challenges office lifestyles present, the benefits in terms of easy communication and social integration are strong enough for employers to continue to develop the model. For example, 29% of employees in open plan offices agreed their working environment allowed for easy communication between colleagues, followed by 24% in private offices and 20% in cubicle style offices. In contrast, only 5% who work from home agree.

Paul Avis, Marketing Director of Canada Life Group, comments: “I have always worked for employers who appreciate that an increased level of productivity can be gained through a flexible approach to home working. While often missing out on the social aspects and colleague engagement, having clear, focused and uninterrupted time is priceless. I have found that a combination of home and office working is the best outcome for me, but note that employers should always be mindful of remote workers. At Canada Life we have field-based Sales Teams and home-based Claims Management Consultants and Rehabilitation Consultants; we certainly don’t want them to feel isolated or under-valued purely because they do not come in to the office every day.

“Despite the advent of technological advances such as faster broadband, employers have not proactively embraced the opportunity to change working patterns. With increasing commute times for many, trusting employees to work from home can increase morale and reduce stress levels whilst giving employees more time in their day. For those of us who are truly engaged with the workplace, the recycling of commuting time into work time provides an immediate gain in productivity, as well as improved health and wellbeing.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Raj Tulsiani: ROI from interim management in the new normal

When I talk to HR leaders, it’s quite clear...

Karen Plum: Six factors to engage employees in the ever-distracted working world

How can we engage employees in the ever-distracted working world? Karen Plum from Advanced Workplace Associates delves into vision and goal clarity, social cohesion, and more.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you