How can HR improve psychological safety in the workplace?

-

A groundbreaking study has revealed that the wellbeing of employees is taking a significant toll on UK companies, costing them a whopping £56 billion each year.

The research highlights the urgent need for organisations to prioritize psychological safety within the workplace, as it emerges as a crucial factor in driving success and optimizing employee performance.

Psychological safety refers to the belief and feeling that individuals can freely express their thoughts, opinions, and ideas within a company without fear of judgment or negative repercussions. Google’s Project Aristotle, which extensively examined effective team dynamics, identified psychological safety as the single most important factor contributing to team effectiveness. In a time marked by global concerns over equity, diversity, and accessibility, along with declining productivity, increased burnout, and diminishing retention rates among workers, creating psychologically safe work environments becomes paramount.

Additionally, research conducted by mental health charity Mind highlights the significant financial impact of poor mental health on UK businesses. The staggering cost of £56 billion per year underscores the critical importance of fostering optimal working conditions for employees.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

What about productivity?

According to BetterUp, a coaching platform, company cultures that foster a strong sense of belonging have witnessed a remarkable 56 percent increase in productivity and a 50 percent reduction in the risk of employee turnover. Furthermore, new research from Rethinkly, a virtual world platform addressing communication and well-being challenges, reveals that nearly one in five UK workers (18%) worry about being judged by their colleagues when making a mistake. As a result, 23 percent of workers with mental health issues claim that their productivity at work is only 50 percent or less of its potential. This finding emphasizes another aspect of psychological safety—recognising when an employee’s threat response is triggered and nurturing an environment where such responses can be alleviated.

To establish and maintain psychological safety effectively, it is crucial for employees at all levels within an organization to foster this environment. The behavior and actions of leaders greatly influence team culture, and creating a psychologically safe workplace necessitates consistent modelling of inclusive behaviors to shape new team norms over time. This also involves identifying when an employee’s threat responses are triggered and addressing them appropriately.

Toxic relationships

Threatening feelings can arise from mishandled feedback, intimidation from team members, or situations that undermine one’s status or autonomy. Given that Rethinkly’s proprietary research unveiled toxic relationships with peers and managers among 11 percent of the British workforce, as well as 15 percent of employees taking time off due to communication challenges, it is evident that investing in a psychologically safe space yields substantial benefits for corporations of all sizes.

In the current climate of widespread absenteeism due to poor mental health and diminished productivity, Rethinkly, a metaverse software widely adopted by the NHS and corporate firms like IBM, offers a solution. Their software enables employees at all levels to create and nurture psychological safety within their workplace. By recreating uncomfortable scenarios in a virtual safe space, Rethinkly’s platform removes real-world references, inspiring autonomy of expression and fostering a psychologically safe environment for growth and collaboration.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Chris Leeson: Why interim managers are good for business

The economic downturn altered the mindsets of many organisations...

General Election manifesto digest – a breakdown for HR professionals

With the General election only a week away, business, individuals and HR teams alike will be wondering how the next UK Government plans to respond to the changing employment landscape. We’ve pulled together a brief summary of the election’s three front-runners to help you compare policies on all things work-related, from zero-hour contracts to maternity and paternity pay.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you