Under a fifth of workers informed about company policy on COVID vaccines

-

Many employees are being left in the dark regarding their company’s policy on the COVID-19 vaccine, with only 17 per cent reporting having a conversation about this.

A survey of 5,000 UK workers by BrightHR has shown that many workers do not yet know what the company policy regarding inoculation is. However, a third stated that they expect it to be made mandatory.

In response to this, a fifth of workers said they would fear for their health if their employer failed to make the vaccine mandatory.

On the other side of the debate, two-thirds of employees questioned believed it would be too controlling for their employer to impose such measures.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

This has largely been the view shared by law firms who have stated mandatory vaccinations could lead to a rise in unfair dismissal claims as well as discrimination claims, especially when the employee has a religious or medical reasoning for refusing to receive the vaccine.

As such, over a third of workers confessed they would worry that people, for which it would not be safe to receive the vaccine, would push for it anyway in order to keep their job.

Analysing industries, workers within the hospitality industry were most likely to believe vaccinations were a good idea (44 per cent), owing to the people-centric nature of their roles.

However, this view was only shared by a quarter (24 per cent) of office workers and even fewer key workers (21 per cent).

Almost one in seven (13 per cent) stated they would not be receiving the vaccine due to the fear of side effects.

This was of particular concern to hospitality workers who expressed significant worry about having to take time off work in the scenario that they did develop side effects. Over three-quarters felt that, as they had returned to work so recently, having to take time off to recover would not be a favourable outcome to them.

However, this difference in opinion when it comes to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is making employees anxious.

For almost half of office workers (47 per cent), they shared that they would have concerns over using shared facilities such as lifts, kitchens and toilets with other companies who might have different views on vaccines.

However, four in five (80 per cent) did trust their employer to keep their office clean and hygienic for staff.

Alan Price, CEO of BrightHR stated:

Although half of people expect their employer to demand a vaccine passport, it remains to be seen how reasonable those demands are and, therefore, whether the employer is acting lawfully in doing so.

Employers must tread carefully when requiring employees to have the vaccine and ensure that their circumstances are appropriate. It may well become that the Government will require employees in some sectors to have the vaccine, and the passport will be a simple way of evidencing that.

It’s good to see from our research that employers have started discussing the vaccine protocols they will put in place and how it will work.

For employers who haven’t, now is the time to start discussing with staff the next steps of how your company will be proceeding with opening of offices/workplaces.


*An online survey was conducted by Atomik Research among 5,005 respondents from the UK. The research fieldwork took place on 1st April – 8th April 2021.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Will Plummer: Staff Shortages Present Security Risks – Cyber and Physical

"Staffing shortages are a big security risk...There are nearly 600,000 unfilled cybersecurity positions."

Dr Macarena Staudenmaier Keglevich: Is Gen Z driving better standards for health support at work?

There’s an appetite for health support at al ages, but younger workers expect health cover as a standard offering from their employers.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you