Two-fifths of employees given less than a week’s notice before shift

-

Research highlights the problem of hours insecurity amongst the workforce, with two in five full or part-time employees being told their working patterns less than a week in advance.  

New surveys by the Living Wage Foundation, an organisation which campaigns for employers to provide staff with a Real Living Wage, has revealed the problems surrounding hours insecurity.

Across the workforce, just under two in five UK workers (37 per cent) in full or part-time employment are given less than a week’s notice of their shifts or work patterns.

This number rises for employees whose job involves variable hours or shift work. Almost two-thirds (62 per cent) reported having under a week’s notice whilst 12 per cent were given under 24 hours before being expected to take on a shift.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It was the capital, London, which was worst afflicted by this. Close to half of workers (48 per cent) received less than a week’s notice of work schedules.

As commonly found during the pandemic, full-time, low paid workers were most impacted by the failure to provide certainty around working hours.

Workers from BAME backgrounds were disproportionately affected, with over two-thirds (68 per cent) being told less than a week in advance about working patterns. Working parents with children were similarly impacted (64 per cent).

Laura Gardiner, Director of the Living Wage Foundation, insisted that this forced workers to make “impossible choices on childcare, transport and other important aspects of family life” during the pandemic.

Employees who earnt under the Real Living Wage, currently set at £10.85 in London and £9.50 in the rest of the UK, were particularly vulnerable to extremely short term notice. Over one in seven workers (15 per cent) were given less than 24 hours notice before shift-work began.

As such, the Living Wage Foundation has encouraged employers to commit to the Living Hours Programme. This requires employers to  pay both a real Living Wage and commit to providing at least 4 weeks’ notice for every shift, with guaranteed payment if shifts are cancelled within this notice period.

In addition to this, it also gives workers a guaranteed minimum of 16 working hours every week (unless the worker requests otherwise), and a contract that accurately reflects hours worked.

Laura Gardiner, Director, Living Wage Foundation, said:

Low-paid workers have been particularly hard hit during the pandemic, with millions struggling to plan their lives due to the double whammy of changing restrictions on economic activity and insufficient notice of work schedules from employers.

Despite this, and the challenges many employers have faced, some have stepped up during this crisis and committed to provide workers with secure, guaranteed hours and notice of shift patterns. These are the businesses that will help us rebuild and recover, and we encourage more employers to follow their example.


*To obtain this research, Survation, commissioned by the Living Wage Foundation, carried out two surveys.  The first polled 2,128 adults working full-time and earning less than the Living Wage and was carried out between 03-14 December 2020. The second survey polled 2,232 UK adults between 25 March-10 April 2021.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Alexia Cambon: Organisations are struggling to connect employees to culture in a hybrid world, so how will they overcome this?

Workplace culture is crucial for an organisation, and perhaps even more so in a hybrid work model, argues Alexia Cambon.

Talia King: Less talk, more action – UK mentoring in its current state will not help businesses meet ED&I objectives.

What should companies should be focussing on to achieve their ED&I objectives?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you