Tribunals will likely increase when furlough scheme ends, experts warn

-

Following the end of the furlough scheme later this year, experts have warned of an increased risk of litigation as redundancies loom large. 

According to Renovo, an outplacement firm, employers must be mindful of how they approach redundancy processes to avoid litigation claims.

The heightened number of litigation claims are expected to arise following the end of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme in September.

During the pandemic, the scheme has supported roughly 11.5 million jobs from 1.3 million employers. However, it is forecast that the ending of this scheme will lead to the number of job losses to rise, with the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicting unemployment will climb to 6.5 per cent by the end of 2021.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Analysis by insurance broker Gallagher found that almost two-thirds (64 per cent) of organisations are expecting business litigation to either remain the same or increase in volume this year. Over half of businesses (56 per cent) have already faced accusations or claims of unlawful behaviour.

The research further suggested that the risk of litigation will rise alongside the length of time employees have spent on furlough.

According to the CIPD’s redundancy guide, employers should ensure that the redundancy consultation process, whether individually or collectively, goes ahead and that staff are allowed to comment on these before they are finalised.  As part of this, the consultation should always include assessing whether there are any other alternatives to redundancy.

Furthermore, the body advises that every employer approaches a redundancy process with compassion and treats everyone with dignity, respect and kindness. Within this, the CIPD express the importance of regular, honest and two-way communication throughout the entire process.

For furloughed staff, employers must be careful to ensure that selection pools and criteria for redundancy are fair, objective and reasonable; are not directly or indirectly discriminatory; and that staff are consulted about them before they are finalised.

Chris Parker, MD at Renovo, explained:

Many employees who will be impacted by redundancies will have been on furlough for a long period of time and may already feel disconnected from the business.

More than ever, employers need to be very mindful of how they manage the messaging and process of redundancy consultation. It will also be very important to look at how they provide support to employees to move on positively post redundancy, and quickly.

As such, Parker continued, advising:

Clarity is key. Be direct and honest, be as clear as possible regarding the situation, the possible outcomes and likely next steps. There is a huge amount to consider, so it’s vital that employers allow time to plan the process.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Will Moynahan: The dynamic board – Good governance, better leadership

There is no doubt, the Enron and Worldcom scandals...

Case Study: Mediation in TfL – Resolving Disputes

In this article, Julia Mixter, Senior HR Business Partner in Transport for London, looks at the case for mediation, the process of introducing it in TfL and anticipates the issues that may arise. Including a list of Issues and Mitigation, and how they are dealt with in the TfL.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you