HR ‘must devolve to line managers despite risks’

-

Businesses need to devolve more responsibility to line managers in order to realise the organisation’s full potential, even if it means that sometimes things go wrong, senior HR professionals have warned.

Leading practitioners shared the successes, and pitfalls, of devolving responsibilities to the line with a conference of HRM MA and MBA students at Westminster Business School last week.

Penny Davis, people and talent director at construction and support services firm Balfour Beatty, told the conference about the growth strategy in the firm’s support services business, called Freedom to Perform, which gave local line managers more accountability both in terms of managing people and in terms of profit and loss.

Davis explained that the key to this strategy is “to trust people and let them get on with it”.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“It’s a bit like being a parent, you want your child to grow up and be successful but actually letting go of them knowing that they are going to make mistakes is very hard,” she told the conference. “A lot of HR and managers like control because we are very risk averse, but letting go is where the real power is.”

She said there still needed to be a prescriptive framework to identify and communicate the correct behaviours to managers, and it was important to have ‘zero tolerance for behaviours that were counter-culture.’ She cited the example of an employee fraud case that had occurred soon after the reform which had given the company pause for thought.

“It was a really disappointing piece of behaviour, and we did think maybe things had gone too far,” said Davis. “But then I was on site and saw an example where a line manager had set up a new way of delivering a service for a client with outstanding results.

She added: “Don’t pull things back centrally [if things go wrong], that’s the easy answer. There is a risk with letting go and we have to balance that against the gains. It depends on your organisational context.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Adrian Marlowe: Understanding IR35

Adrian Marlowe helps you get to grips with IR35, the new tax rules that comes in to effect April 2020.

Tom Kerr Williams: Managing strike action

Most employers look to avoid industrial strike action wherever possible, but there comes a time in every unionised employer’s existence where such action is threatened.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you