Rise in state pension age brought forward 7 years

-

‘Demographic pressures’ are prompting the government to adapt its pensions policy.

The government has announced that it is to bring forward the rise in state pension age from 67 to 68.

The age increase will now take place between 2037 and 2039, seven years earlier than had originally been intended.

This decision will save the government an estimated £74 billion, but the unions have poured scorn on the move labeling it a ‘bitter blow’ to those who work in the public sector, as their workplace  pension is tied to the state pension age.

“This move is not based on people living longer. It’s a cynical move to make many low-paid workers in the NHS and local government either wait longer for their pension, or take a pension cut if they finish work early,” Dave Prentis, general secretary of Unison, told The Financial Times.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The government claims that it faces a ticking time bomb of differing demographic pressures, which will see the numbers of people reaching pensionable age ballooning over the next few years.

The Office for National Statistics has forecast that the number of people above state pension age in the UK is set to grow from 12.4m in 2017 to 16.9m by 2042.

“Because life expectancy is increasing, people affected by this rise will be spending longer on average in receipt of the state pension than people have spent over the age of 65 over the last 25 years, and on average will receive more in state pension over their retirement than previous generations,” David Gauke, the pensions secretary, commented.

The plan is expected to reduce state pension spending by 0.4 per cent of GDP in 2039/40.

The current state pension age for men is 65 and 64 for women, this will equalise by 2018 and then rise to 66 by 2020 and 67 by 2028.

The government’s proposals will not affect anyone born on or before April 5 1970.

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Civil service attendance row raises questions over remote work oversight

Concerns over hybrid working oversight grow after claims of low office attendance across parts of the civil service.

UK leads Europe on salary transparency as EU pay deadline approaches

UK job adverts remain more open about pay than those in other major European economies as new transparency rules approach across the EU.

From factory floor to HR leader at CEVA Logistics

An HR leader at CEVA Logistics reflects on career growth, commuting, learning, leadership and balancing work with life at home.

Vacancies rise but UK jobs market remains near five-year lows as salaries pass £44,000

UK hiring shows modest improvement as pay rises continue, but job competition remains high and entry-level opportunities stay limited.
- Advertisement -

Jo Kansagra: How business can get 20% more out of their employees

Stress is more than a wellbeing concern. When employees are burnt out, overwhelmed, and excessively busy it harms their motivation and productivity.

Is working from home really a career killer?

Jennifer Liston-Smith’s reflections on leadership, work-life blend and the meaning of work. With fierce debate for and against working from...

Must read

Pay-for-Performance and the Science Behind What Motivates Us

Talent professionals sometimes think that potential new hires will simply follow the money, and therefore a dollar amount is everything. But what if this model for compensation is misaligned with what employees really value?

Chris Moriarty: What can employers do to create a happy workforce?

In a market where the battle for talent is becoming increasingly competitive, employers are being dazzled by the appeal of sophisticated “wellness programmes” without considering the direct impact of a decade of under-investment in the physical workplace.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you