P&O boss admits paying crew £4.87 per hour

-

In an admission before Members of Parliament, Peter Hebblethwaite, the CEO of P&O Ferries, acknowledged his inability to subsist on the meagre wage of £4.87 per hour, a wage some of his crew members are paid.

This revelation comes amidst mounting scrutiny over the company’s treatment of its workforce, particularly its decision to terminate hundreds of employees without prior notice and replace them with agency staff.

Mr. Hebblethwaite disclosed that he amassed over £500,000 in earnings last year, a figure that includes a substantial bonus.

However, his remarks at the parliamentary hearing shed light on the stark disparity between his compensation and that of the crew members he oversees.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The controversy surrounding P&O Ferries erupted in 2022 when the company laid off 786 staff members, sparking public outrage and prompting governmental action to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Despite Mr. Hebblethwaite’s apology for the redundancies, questions persist regarding the ethics of the company’s practices.

P&O’s use of agency workers

During the hearing, Mr. Hebblethwaite defended P&O’s use of agency workers, citing international standards for crew compensation. He emphasised that the wages paid by P&O exceed the minimum basic wage required by international law, despite criticism from lawmakers.

Critics, including Liam Byrne, chair of the Business and Trade Committee, condemned P&O’s actions, accusing the company of exploiting its workforce. The comparison drawn by the committee chair between P&O’s practices and piracy underscored the gravity of the situation.

While the UK raised its minimum wage to £11.44 per hour in April, many P&O crew members are recruited from overseas, further complicating the issue. Mr. Hebblethwaite reiterated P&O’s adherence to international laws but faced scepticism from MPs who likened the company’s actions to modern-day slavery.

In response to queries about his own financial situation, Mr. Hebblethwaite conceded that he could not survive on the wage offered to some of his crew members. He expressed regret for the impact of the mass layoffs on affected employees and their families, asserting that the decision was necessary to salvage the company.

Modern-day slavery

Labour MP Andy McDonald echoed widespread concerns, describing P&O’s practices as tantamount to modern-day slavery. The lack of repercussions for P&O’s actions has drawn criticism, with calls for stricter regulations and sanctions against the company.

The government, recognising the need for legislative reform, announced plans to close loopholes in maritime law exploited by P&O Ferries. Anticipated legislation aims to enforce the £11.44 per hour minimum wage for ferry operators, signalling a potential shift towards greater accountability and fairness in the industry.

As the controversy surrounding P&O Ferries unfolds, questions persist about corporate responsibility and the treatment of workers in the maritime sector. Mr. Hebblethwaite’s acknowledgment of the stark wage disparity underscores the pressing need for systemic reform to ensure fair labour practices and protect the rights of employees.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Gen Z vs Gen X: how work expectations are reshaping employee experience  

Are we just seeing someone’s life stage and calling it generational difference? 

Josiah Lockhart: Benefits of engaging with employees’ hidden home-heating challenge

The office thermostat can be a point of discussion – or contention – at work, but the temperatures of our home workspaces get far less attention.  
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you