HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

P&O boss admits paying crew £4.87 per hour

-

In an admission before Members of Parliament, Peter Hebblethwaite, the CEO of P&O Ferries, acknowledged his inability to subsist on the meagre wage of £4.87 per hour, a wage some of his crew members are paid.

This revelation comes amidst mounting scrutiny over the company’s treatment of its workforce, particularly its decision to terminate hundreds of employees without prior notice and replace them with agency staff.

Mr. Hebblethwaite disclosed that he amassed over £500,000 in earnings last year, a figure that includes a substantial bonus.

However, his remarks at the parliamentary hearing shed light on the stark disparity between his compensation and that of the crew members he oversees.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The controversy surrounding P&O Ferries erupted in 2022 when the company laid off 786 staff members, sparking public outrage and prompting governmental action to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Despite Mr. Hebblethwaite’s apology for the redundancies, questions persist regarding the ethics of the company’s practices.

P&O’s use of agency workers

During the hearing, Mr. Hebblethwaite defended P&O’s use of agency workers, citing international standards for crew compensation. He emphasised that the wages paid by P&O exceed the minimum basic wage required by international law, despite criticism from lawmakers.

Critics, including Liam Byrne, chair of the Business and Trade Committee, condemned P&O’s actions, accusing the company of exploiting its workforce. The comparison drawn by the committee chair between P&O’s practices and piracy underscored the gravity of the situation.

While the UK raised its minimum wage to £11.44 per hour in April, many P&O crew members are recruited from overseas, further complicating the issue. Mr. Hebblethwaite reiterated P&O’s adherence to international laws but faced scepticism from MPs who likened the company’s actions to modern-day slavery.

In response to queries about his own financial situation, Mr. Hebblethwaite conceded that he could not survive on the wage offered to some of his crew members. He expressed regret for the impact of the mass layoffs on affected employees and their families, asserting that the decision was necessary to salvage the company.

Modern-day slavery

Labour MP Andy McDonald echoed widespread concerns, describing P&O’s practices as tantamount to modern-day slavery. The lack of repercussions for P&O’s actions has drawn criticism, with calls for stricter regulations and sanctions against the company.

The government, recognising the need for legislative reform, announced plans to close loopholes in maritime law exploited by P&O Ferries. Anticipated legislation aims to enforce the £11.44 per hour minimum wage for ferry operators, signalling a potential shift towards greater accountability and fairness in the industry.

As the controversy surrounding P&O Ferries unfolds, questions persist about corporate responsibility and the treatment of workers in the maritime sector. Mr. Hebblethwaite’s acknowledgment of the stark wage disparity underscores the pressing need for systemic reform to ensure fair labour practices and protect the rights of employees.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Andrea Winfield: Why HR & ethics are crucial for AI’s unknown future

What does the HR director of Microsoft UK make of AI?

Mathias Linnemann: Measuring what matters in recruitment

"Psychometric tests can provide an assessment of the candidate, they should never stand alone."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you