Employers not offering overseas staff appropriate benefits

-

New research from international healthcare provider, Expacare, has indicated that while companies are now looking to expand overseas, they are taking unnecessary risks when it comes to their employees’ health.

The report examined employers’ duty of care to staff they send abroad and found that the benefit options provided by employers operating internationally varied little from those provided for employees solely based in the UK.

Forty-one per-cent of employers said that the overall value of the package offered to UK and international based staff did not differ, while 24% of employers see offering a relocation allowance to staff as a core provision.

Of the employers questioned, the majority look to post an employee abroad for between three to six months, with 27% looking to send employees overseas for six months to a year which suggests that businesses are increasingly looking to take advantage of growth opportunities overseas. However, the report suggests that they are not offering the necessary benefits packages for their international staff.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employers also revealed differing attitudes towards health insurance provision for their employees with 33% stating that it is a personal choice for employees and 24% saying they would like to provide it but cannot afford to.

Beverly Cook, Managing Director of Expacare, comments:

“The research has shown that employers are all too often leaving their staff vulnerable when relocating them to work overseas. There seems to be real confusion over policies, with far too many businesses assuming that their employees will be covered if they are located in the EU and that an employee’s travel insurance policy will cover all their health needs, which is rarely the case.

“Relocating employees internationally poses unique challenges to employers large and small and with health inflation at an all-time high it has never been more important for them to ensure that their staff are properly protected.”

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Helen Tucker: Mental Health in the Workplace – how companies can act in 2017

As the days get shorter and temperatures drop, October...

Stephen Smith: Winning a gold medal in the business continuity Olympics

With Olympics tickets allocated and successful applicants now certain...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you