Employers not offering overseas staff appropriate benefits

-

New research from international healthcare provider, Expacare, has indicated that while companies are now looking to expand overseas, they are taking unnecessary risks when it comes to their employees’ health.

The report examined employers’ duty of care to staff they send abroad and found that the benefit options provided by employers operating internationally varied little from those provided for employees solely based in the UK.

Forty-one per-cent of employers said that the overall value of the package offered to UK and international based staff did not differ, while 24% of employers see offering a relocation allowance to staff as a core provision.

Of the employers questioned, the majority look to post an employee abroad for between three to six months, with 27% looking to send employees overseas for six months to a year which suggests that businesses are increasingly looking to take advantage of growth opportunities overseas. However, the report suggests that they are not offering the necessary benefits packages for their international staff.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employers also revealed differing attitudes towards health insurance provision for their employees with 33% stating that it is a personal choice for employees and 24% saying they would like to provide it but cannot afford to.

Beverly Cook, Managing Director of Expacare, comments:

“The research has shown that employers are all too often leaving their staff vulnerable when relocating them to work overseas. There seems to be real confusion over policies, with far too many businesses assuming that their employees will be covered if they are located in the EU and that an employee’s travel insurance policy will cover all their health needs, which is rarely the case.

“Relocating employees internationally poses unique challenges to employers large and small and with health inflation at an all-time high it has never been more important for them to ensure that their staff are properly protected.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Talent Management insights – research and whitepapers

The people in your business will make the difference...

Nelson Sivalingam: Skills over status – why CEOs don’t care about job titles

Perhaps it’s disingenuous to say that job titles don’t matter. But if the past decade taught us anything, it’s that we’re in a time of change.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you