DWP says PPF cap will be linked to length of service

-

pensionfundThe Government has announced that the cap on compensation paid by the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) will be changed to give more money to long-serving employees with large pension pots.

Currently, benefits for members of schemes that end up in the PPF after an employer insolvency who have not reached normal retirement age are capped at £31,380 a year. However, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) this week revealed that this cap would be increased by 3% for every full year of service above 20 years completed by an employee.

This means that someone who has put money into a pension scheme for 40 years and amassed a pension of £50,000, only to see their scheme fold, would receive £45,000 rather than the £31,380, which is the current capped amount.

Commenting, Minister for Pensions, Steve Webb, said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“It cannot be right that someone who has been with a company for much of their working life – and relies heavily on that for their pension income – gets the same in compensation as someone with far shorter service and who could also have other pension income to fall back on.”

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has responded to the news by describing the proposed changes as a “bitter blow to firms struggling to drive economic growth and fund their own pension schemes”.

Neil Carberry, CBI Director for Employment and Skills, said:

“The fund is paid for by business, not the Government. At a cost of over £600m a year, it is already more than double the original plan, and the levy is likely to rise again this year. An even greater levy will hold back business investment and growth.

“Businesses support the PPF and would have expected more engagement before this announcement was made.”

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Jeanette Makings: Financial Education – One size doesn’t fit all

Of the many hats employers have to wear when...

Hannah Robbins: To what extent are your off the record discussions with employees protected?

Off the record discussions or protected conversations have played a significant role in employer-employee exit negotiations since they became inadmissible in unfair dismissal proceedings on the 29th July 2013, but not every conversation is automatically protected. To what extent can employers genuinely have an off the record discussion?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you