Quarter of Brits would turn down dream job if it wasn’t hybrid

-

Almost one-quarter of Brits would turn down the offer of their ‘dream job’ if it meant they had to go into the office full-time, according to new data.

A survey conducted by Censuswide on behalf of flexible office experts Space32, which interviewed 2,000 UK adults, revealed that 23 percent of respondents would be unwilling to return to the office five days a week in exchange for their dream job. An additional 14 percent were unsure if they would accept a dream job offer that required them to be in the office full-time.

These findings come at a time when leaders at companies such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Twitter are advocating for a full-time office return for their employees.

However, the survey results suggest a significant resistance to such a shift.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

A gender disparity

The survey also highlighted a gender disparity in willingness to work in the office full-time. Women, for whom remote working has proven particularly beneficial, were less likely than men to forgo remote working for their dream job. Only 59 percent of women surveyed expressed willingness to go into the office five days a week, compared to 67 percent of men.

Furthermore, the data revealed that younger individuals were more inclined to sacrifice remote working for their dream role. Among respondents aged 25-34, a striking 78 percent stated they would go into the office five days a week for their ideal job. This willingness decreased slightly with age, with 76 percent of those aged 35-44 and 71 percent of 18-24 year olds expressing the same sentiment. These findings contrast with recent research suggesting that younger generations generally prefer remote work.

Conversely, less than half of those aged 55 and over were willing to make a full-time return to the office for their dream job, with only 45 percent willing to give up flexible working. However, for individuals aged 45-54, this number increased to 68 percent.

When asked if they would be willing to go into the office more often to aid their career progression, respondents aged 25-34 showed the highest level of agreement, with 79 percent saying yes. Similarly, 68 percent of those aged 18-24 and 35-44 expressed a willingness to increase their office presence for career advancement. In contrast, older age groups were less inclined to do so, with only 34 percent of those aged 55 and above indicating a willingness to increase office time for career progression.

Jon Dweck, CEO and co-founder of Space32, commented on the survey results, stating:

“The fact that almost a quarter of British people would be unwilling to go into the office five days a week – even if offered their dream job – is a striking indication that those pushing for a full-time office return are fighting a losing battle. It shows that flexible working options, whether hybrid or fully remote, remain a highly-valued, and often essential, asset. Employees should not have to sacrifice these to progress in their desired careers – and many are willing to vote with their feet.”

Dweck added, “For younger generations in particular, who are at an earlier stage in their careers, going into the office full-time should not be a prerequisite for success. Employers must ditch this one-size-fits-all approach and acknowledge that employee attitudes have shifted. They must evolve their office policies accordingly and provide a more inclusive, flexible, and accessible workplace for all.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Aon’s – 2026 Human Capital Trends Study

This study, based on Aon’s 2026 Human Capital Trends Survey and insights from human capital specialists, equips senior leaders with the perspective needed to navigate this shift and unlock sustainable growth.

Menopause support gaps push women out of jobs as ‘masking’ takes toll

Women consider leaving jobs as menopause symptoms go unsupported, with many hiding their condition at work.

Workers ‘ignore AI tools and stick with manual tasks’ despite heavy investment

Employees are avoiding workplace AI tools and reverting to manual tasks, raising concerns about trust, usability and the value of tech investment.

Victor Riparbelli on AI boosting the value of people

“AI will make great human communicators even more valuable than before.”
- Advertisement -

Up to 28,000 employees affected by paper-based data breaches

Thousands of workers affected by paper-based data incidents as organisations miss reporting deadlines and overlook offline risks.

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Must read

Kjetil J. Olsen: Does HR have the tools to manage skills across today’s hybrid workforces?

The world of work is changing at breakneck speed....

Rachel Roxburgh: Helping young people on the route to success

In this year’s Budget, Chancellor Phillip Hammond pledged to invest in “game-changing reforms” for technical qualifications, including £500million a year for “Tech-Levels”. Tech-Levels, or T-Levels, are being touted as an alternative to A-Levels. Between now and 2022, 15 new pathways will be developed in 15 sector areas where substantial technical training is required to progress into employment.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you