HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Quarter of Brits would turn down dream job if it wasn’t hybrid

-

Almost one-quarter of Brits would turn down the offer of their ‘dream job’ if it meant they had to go into the office full-time, according to new data.

A survey conducted by Censuswide on behalf of flexible office experts Space32, which interviewed 2,000 UK adults, revealed that 23 percent of respondents would be unwilling to return to the office five days a week in exchange for their dream job. An additional 14 percent were unsure if they would accept a dream job offer that required them to be in the office full-time.

These findings come at a time when leaders at companies such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Twitter are advocating for a full-time office return for their employees.

However, the survey results suggest a significant resistance to such a shift.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

A gender disparity

The survey also highlighted a gender disparity in willingness to work in the office full-time. Women, for whom remote working has proven particularly beneficial, were less likely than men to forgo remote working for their dream job. Only 59 percent of women surveyed expressed willingness to go into the office five days a week, compared to 67 percent of men.

Furthermore, the data revealed that younger individuals were more inclined to sacrifice remote working for their dream role. Among respondents aged 25-34, a striking 78 percent stated they would go into the office five days a week for their ideal job. This willingness decreased slightly with age, with 76 percent of those aged 35-44 and 71 percent of 18-24 year olds expressing the same sentiment. These findings contrast with recent research suggesting that younger generations generally prefer remote work.

Conversely, less than half of those aged 55 and over were willing to make a full-time return to the office for their dream job, with only 45 percent willing to give up flexible working. However, for individuals aged 45-54, this number increased to 68 percent.

When asked if they would be willing to go into the office more often to aid their career progression, respondents aged 25-34 showed the highest level of agreement, with 79 percent saying yes. Similarly, 68 percent of those aged 18-24 and 35-44 expressed a willingness to increase their office presence for career advancement. In contrast, older age groups were less inclined to do so, with only 34 percent of those aged 55 and above indicating a willingness to increase office time for career progression.

Jon Dweck, CEO and co-founder of Space32, commented on the survey results, stating:

“The fact that almost a quarter of British people would be unwilling to go into the office five days a week – even if offered their dream job – is a striking indication that those pushing for a full-time office return are fighting a losing battle. It shows that flexible working options, whether hybrid or fully remote, remain a highly-valued, and often essential, asset. Employees should not have to sacrifice these to progress in their desired careers – and many are willing to vote with their feet.”

Dweck added, “For younger generations in particular, who are at an earlier stage in their careers, going into the office full-time should not be a prerequisite for success. Employers must ditch this one-size-fits-all approach and acknowledge that employee attitudes have shifted. They must evolve their office policies accordingly and provide a more inclusive, flexible, and accessible workplace for all.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Sam Ross: The future of flexible working in the UK

The buzz surrounding the Flexible Working Act having achieved Royal Assent has been hard to miss on LinkedIn and in HR circles, says Sam Ross.

Katherine Conway: How can we beat unconscious gender bias in the workplace?

It’s easy to assume that the business case for gender parity has been won. Innumerable studies have shown the benefits of greater gender equality in the workplace and of introducing more women to leadership positions. One recent study estimated that gender parity could add $12 trillion to the global economy, while others have found that companies with women on their boards outperform those with all-male boards, leading to an opportunity cost of $655 billion a year in the U.S., U.K. and India alone.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you