CV spelling and grammar mistakes the most annoying for employers

-

Spelling and grammar mistakes come top of the list of things that employers find annoying in CVs, according to a new poll from GSM London.

Senior decision makers across a number of sectors and business sizes took part in the survey and 87 percent revealed that they would find spelling and grammar mistakes the most annoying. This put it top of the list, ahead of poor CV design and including too much personal information.

Ranking second on the list, with 76 percent was the inclusion of incorrect information, such as wrong contact name or company name. This was closely followed by missing key information, such as contact details and dates of employment, with 74 percent.

Also revealed in the poll, employers found CVs that were too long more annoying (46%) than a CV that is too short (26%), suggesting that briefness is key for jobseekers.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Andrew Falconer, director of Careers & Employability at GSM London, says:

“This survey confirms that it’s essential to get the basics right. Qualifications and experience count but if you don’t present yourself professionally it could all be for nothing. Employers are looking for succinct, targeted information that helps them make a decision. With so much support available, there can be no excuses for not getting this right.”

The majority of employers said they were fine with an applicant including a picture of themselves in the CV, with only 13 percent saying they would be annoyed by it.

Gender seems to be a dependant factors on what was found to be annoying, with females more likely to be annoyed with short CVs (28%) than men (25%). However, men were more likely to be annoyed if a CV was too long (49%) than women (37%).

Men were also more likely to be annoyed by too much information (30%) than women (26%), and if irrelevant experience and education were included (25% vs 21%).

Business size also seems to be a factor, as larger businesses were more likely to find long CVs (52%) and too much personal information (34%) annoying.

Amie Filcher is an editorial assistant at HRreview.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Holly Navarro: How employers can support Muslim employees during Ramadan

As people continue to celebrate Ramadan, Employment Law Solicitor, Holly Navarro, considers the key points employers should bear in mind during this period.

Case study: Bioenergetics consultancy provides expert stress relief for employees

Ruane Bioenergetics focuses on a unique three-step process that identifies, resolves and equips people to cope with the effects of stress. The system can help to dramatically improve the efficiency and productivity of staff, tackling the high levels of absenteeism and low productivity prevalent in a worki
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you