3 in 10 employers are likely to make redundancies over the next year!

-

A recent survey conducted by Acas has revealed that 30 percent of UK employers are likely to make staff redundancies over the next year.

The survey was commissioned by Acas and conducted by YouGov, with British businesses being asked about their redundancy plans for the next 12 months.

Large businesses more likely to make redundancies

The poll found that two in five (41%) large businesses are likely to make redundancies, compared to one in five (20%) small and medium-sized (SME) businesses. Acas Chief Executive, Susan Clews, commented on the findings, saying, “Some businesses across

Britain are facing tough challenges and our poll reveals that three in ten are considering redundancies in the year ahead. Our findings also show that large organizations are more likely to make redundancies than smaller organizations that employ less than 250 employees.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Strict rules for consulting staff

Employers who find there are no other options but to make redundancies must follow strict rules on consulting staff. An employer must discuss any planned changes and consult with each employee who could be affected, including those who may not be losing their jobs but will be impacted.

The minimum consultation period varies depending on the number of employees an employer wishes to make redundant. By law, employers who wish to make 20 or more staff redundant over any three-month (90 day) period must also consult with a recognized trade union or elected employee representatives about the proposed changes.

For 20-99 redundancies, consultation must start at least 30 days before the first dismissal can take effect, and for 100 or more redundancies, it has to start at least 45 days before. For less than 20 redundancies, there is no set time period, but the length of consultation must be reasonable.

Costly legal process for non-compliance

If an employer fails to meet consultation requirements, employees can take their employer to an employment tribunal. If successful, the employer may have to pay up to 90 days’ full pay for each affected employee. Someone can also make a claim of unfair dismissal to an employment tribunal on the grounds that they were not consulted or the consultation was not meaningful.

Consider all possible alternatives

Employers are advised to exhaust all possible alternatives to redundancies first. Acas advisers have seen many examples of joint working that have produced creative alternatives to job losses. These include part-time working, cuts to overtime, finding alternative roles, and retraining. Clews emphasizes the importance of considering these options, saying, “If employers feel like they have no choice but to make redundancies, then they must follow the law in this area, or they could be subject to a costly legal process.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Dr Lizzie Tuckey: Can work-related stress work to your advantage?

This might sound surprising, but a certain amount of pressure at work can be a good thing.  It can improve performance and mentally prepare you for challenges. It’s a balancing act though. If pressure builds up it can lead to stress, which in the workplace results in over 10.4 million working days lost each yea

Kelly Sayers: Preparing to compete and ‘fessing up’.

Employees changing jobs is a fact of life. But...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you