HRreview Header

Maternity leave: women lose £2,400 a year in retirement

-

- Advertisment -

New research from more2life and Cebr has found that women lose £2,400 per year in retirement.

This is as a result of taking time out of the workplace – often to have children – with women who took three or more years seeing this loss increase to £3,060 annually.

The gender split is readily apparent, with two-thirds (68%) of women aged over-55 in the UK having taken time out of the workplace compared to only 22 percent of men the same age.

The main driving force behind this was the need to take maternity leave to look after children, with 53 percent of women taking career breaks for this reason compared to just 1 percent of men over-55 having done so.

A higher proportion of women compared to men felt that taking a career break led to a lower retirement income (48% vs 38%) and women were also more likely to call this impact ‘significant’ (30% vs 17% of men).

Retirement: men who do take career breaks see a sharper income hit

However, men who take a career break see their retirement income fall more sharply compared to their counterparts than women in the same situation – the research shows a drop of £4,680 compared to men who did not take a career break, nearly twice that of women.

Men also take less time out of the workplace than women on average, 2.7 years (cumulative) compared to 4.9 years (cumulative) for women, and still see this sharper fall.

The data shows that men will also see retirement income notably reduced if they take extended parental leave, potentially discouraging people from breaking down the gender expectation that a mother will take time off work to raise children, not a father.

However, it must be noted, that men who see this loss of retirement income due to a career break only receive £48 less each year, just £4 a month, than women who did not take any career break at all, as a result of the gender pension gap.

 

Men are more likely to own an independent pension wealth

Given the proportion of women experiencing this reduction in retirement income and the gender pension gap as a whole, it is unsurprising that men are also far more likely to own pension wealth independently (46% vs 36%).

Men over-55 are also more likely to have independent wealth in other forms such as cash savings (45% vs 43%), tangible assets (30% vs 25%) and investments in stocks and shares (22% vs 14%).

That said, older women were more likely than men to have independent wealth when it came to property, with 27 percent of women owning property independently compared to 17 percent of men.

However, this trend goes beyond just men having more independent wealth than women, as women often do not have any independent financial fallback option at all.

Only 36 percent of women surveyed owned independent pension wealth and more (37%) did not have any pension wealth at all, a slight drop compared to the 40 percent that reported no pension wealth whatsoever in our 2021 research.

Les Pick, Director of Manufacturing and Adviser Propositions at more2life, comments:

“While the gender pension gap that is facing women is typically due to lower salaries, the fact that women are being penalised for taking time out to caring for their children is extremely frustrating. As a country, we know that people are reaching retirement with insufficient pension savings and if we want to manage this challenge, we need to consider how we allow people to raise their families and grow their pension pots at the same time.

“We also need better understanding and greater systems in place to ensure that the slower career progression, reduced retirement savings and less financial independence that women have come to expect are not only identified and addressed in the office, but in retirement too. The fact that more women than men are likely to own property wealth gives one ray of hope as to how we can address the shortfall in the near term, and we’re committed to making sure advisers have all the tools to discuss equity release with those that may need it.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Just 30% of recruiters say they receive high-quality job applications, research finds

Fewer than one in three hiring professionals say they received high-quality applications for their most recent hire.

Finance professionals ‘expect ESG and DEI focus to decline’

More than half of financial services professionals in the UK believe their company leaders will place less emphasis DEI over the next five years.

Crystel Robbins Rynne: Corporate pride – True LGBTQ+ allyship or meaningless rainbow-washing?

It’s Pride Month, and workplaces around the world are publicising their LGBTQ+ solidarity. Yet the multi-coloured flags get packed away as soon as July arrives.

Tribunal claims related to menopause triple in two years as caseload grows

Menopause-related claims have more than tripled over the past two years. There were 204 tribunal cases referencing menopause in 2024, compared with 64 in 2022.
- Advertisement -

UK workers ‘ready for AI’, but employer support lags behind

British employees are increasingly optimistic about AI in the workplace - but their employers are not keeping up with the hype.

Fiona McCoy, chief people officer at Lowe Rental

Lowe Rental’s chief people officer shares her routine, career journey and insights into HR’s evolving role in a fast-growing global business.

Must read

Nick Matthews: How line managers will keep workforces engaged for the return to work

"Understanding what support and skilling the UK workforce needs post-pandemic as we gear up for the so-called return to work is a priority."

Clare Parkinson: Can we scrap our employee bonus scheme?

What can you do if your organisation can no longer afford an employee bonus scheme?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you