LGBT+ workers more likely to face harrassment and conflict at work

-

New research finds that LGBT+ employees have lower rates of job satisfaction, feel less psychologically safe whilst at work and are more likely to face harrassment and conflict. 

A new report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) has analysed the various challenges that LGBT+ workers face whilst at work.

Research shows that LGB+ (lesbian, gay and bisexual workers) and transgender workers report higher levels of workplace conflict than heterosexual, cisgender workers.

Specifically, two-fifths of LGB+ employees (40 per cent) said they had faced workplace conflict over the last year in comparison to almost three in 10 (29 per cent) heterosexual employees.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In addition to this, transgender workers fared much worse with over half (55 per cent) reporting that they faced conflict in the workplace.

The research also suggested that there was room for improvement regarding how the issue was resolved.

Almost half of LGB+ workers (44 per cent) who experienced being humiliated or undermined stated that the situation had not been resolved. Over a third of respondents (38 per cent) stated that the conflict had only been partially resolved, leaving only a very small minority of employees that felt the conflict had been completely dealt with.

Employees that are LGB+ also were more likely to report lower rates of job satisfaction and psychological safety.

In comparison to heterosexual workers, of which over four in five (85 per cent) stated that they had ‘somewhat’ to ‘very good’ working relationships, only 80 per cent of LGB+ and three-quarters of transgender employees (75 per cent) felt the same.

When questioned about job satisfaction, only half of transgender employees (50 per cent) felt satisfied in their job. Trans employees were also most likely to feel actively dissatisfied with their job (33 per cent) whilst less than a fifth of heterosexual employees (15 per cent) felt the same.

Additionally, one in six LGB+ (16 per cent) and just under a fifth (18 per cent) of transgender employees felt psychologically unsafe at work. Only one in 10 heterosexual workers  (10 per cent) reported feeling this too.

As such, the CIPD made various recommendations on how organisations can work on making a more inclusive culture for LGBT+ employees:

  • Ensuring that anti-discrimination policies and practices are fit for purpose and carried out throughout the organisation
  • Policies should set clear expectations of what is acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, with practical examples
  • Ensuring people feel able to report conflict and that it is investigated seriously
  • Building a peer support and allyship network that LGBT+ employees can approach as the first point of contact when they have faced bullying and harassment
  • Fostering positive and inclusive work relationships. Enabling opportunities to create a shared purpose.
  • Encouraging conversations about the value of inclusion and understanding people’s differences, and why they are important
  • Gain buy-in and support from senior leadership – this is vital for building more inclusive workplaces

Wilson Wong, Head of Insight and Futures at CIPD, said:

People professionals have a leading role to play in promoting good work and developing inclusion at work. For LGBT+ employees, this means taking a granular, consultative approach to understand barriers to inclusion within organisations, and creating safe spaces for LGBT+ employees to share their lived experience, as well as building confidence that harassment and bullying will be dealt with.

We hope that the research insights and practice recommendations in this report will highlight potential barriers to LGBT+ inclusion at work, and a basis from which to tackle these.


*This research was obtained from the CIPD’s ‘Inclusion at work: Perspectives on LGBT+ working lives’ report which was published in February 2021.

The body drew on four sources of data including: pooled data from the CIPD’s 2018, 2019 and 2020 Good Work Index to understand experiences of LGB+employees, one bespoke survey on trans working lives, an additional survey on trans allyship and insights from senior people professional roundtables on LGBT+ inclusion.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Jobs data reliability questioned after ONS survey mistake

Concerns have emerged over the quality of upcoming labour market figures after a survey error resulted in more than 1,000 interviews being missed.

Sarah Williams: Beyond the traditional interview – redesigning hiring for neurodivergent talent

Neuroinclusive hiring is often treated as a specialist initiative, when it is a fundamentally a capability issue.

Recruitment firms caught up in rise in illegal working penalties

Increased enforcement activity has seen staffing businesses appear on Home Office penalty lists, prompting renewed focus on hiring compliance.

Jensen Huang on staying relevant at work

“Don't get bored and don't get fired.”
- Advertisement -

Amy Speake: Why a cooling job market is the worst time to hire a leader

A slowing labour market should be a hiring manager's dream. But anyone trying to recruit a leader capable of driving real commercial growth will tell you otherwise.

Bezos joins growing pushback against AI jobs apocalypse claims

Tech leaders are increasingly questioning predictions of mass workforce disruption, arguing new tools could expand opportunities and ease skills shortages.

Must read

Yuan Deng: HR’s role in ensuring AI adoption is fair and effective

AI is changing how work is done across organisations, but rolling it out well is as much a people challenge as a technology one.

Tim Kemp: What will the CHRO of 2020 look like?

What does the future hold for CHRO? Boards are already asking for more of the HR function, with the role of the HR professional becoming multi-faceted and more externally focused.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you