L&G vow to vote against FTSE 100 if they do not hire a BAME board member

-

Legal & General (L&G), a leading financial services company, has demanded that all FTSE-100 companies must have a BAME (Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic) director by 2022.

L&G has announced that they are calling on all FTSE 100 companies and S&P 500 in the US to appoint a non-white director by 2022. If it does not meet this deadline, it has vowed to vote against the re-appointment of the national committee chairman from the 30 plus firms that have all-white boards. HRreview has previously reported on the CBI calling on the FTSE 100 to appoint at least one non-white member at board level by 2021. 

This is a significant move as L&G manages £1.2 trillion worth of pension funds which means it owns up to 3 per cent of every British blue-chip company.

According to a report published by L&G, over half (52 per cent) of FTSE 100 companies have all caucasian boards. It also stated that 37 per cent of firms in the S&P 500 also have all-white boards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

L&G stated that the company chose to make this decision after the murder of George Floyd in the US, writing:

The horrifying killing of George Floyd and so many others has led many institutional investors to think much more seriously about structural racism and inequality.

We have been longstanding advocates for cognitive diversity in the companies in which we invest, and have spent a lot of time improving the gender balance of those companies, through both engagement and voting, with great success in the UK and in the US.

Our expectation is that companies set ambitions related to the ethnic composition of their organisation, throughout the workforce, with a particular emphasis at the board level, which generally sets the tone from the top.

For companies that fail to meet our transparent and rules-based minimum expectations, there will be voting and investment consequences.

We focus on the board, as this is where accountability for the issue belongs, and where we can have most influence as we are able to elect board members annually.

 

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Lucinda Bromfield: The concept of ‘reasonable’

A lot of employment law is founded on the...

Tim Boote: The guide to interim managers – When to bring one in and hiring right first time

There has been much talk about the ‘gig economy’ – an environment in which temporary positions are common and organisations contract with independent workers for short-term engagements. However, ‘gig’ working is nothing new. Organisations have been hiring interim professionals on temporary contracts for years now, and as short-term deliverers of a service, they are well-placed to be part of the ‘gig economy’.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you