HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

L&G vow to vote against FTSE 100 if they do not hire a BAME board member

-

Legal & General (L&G), a leading financial services company, has demanded that all FTSE-100 companies must have a BAME (Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic) director by 2022.

L&G has announced that they are calling on all FTSE 100 companies and S&P 500 in the US to appoint a non-white director by 2022. If it does not meet this deadline, it has vowed to vote against the re-appointment of the national committee chairman from the 30 plus firms that have all-white boards. HRreview has previously reported on the CBI calling on the FTSE 100 to appoint at least one non-white member at board level by 2021. 

This is a significant move as L&G manages £1.2 trillion worth of pension funds which means it owns up to 3 per cent of every British blue-chip company.

According to a report published by L&G, over half (52 per cent) of FTSE 100 companies have all caucasian boards. It also stated that 37 per cent of firms in the S&P 500 also have all-white boards.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

L&G stated that the company chose to make this decision after the murder of George Floyd in the US, writing:

The horrifying killing of George Floyd and so many others has led many institutional investors to think much more seriously about structural racism and inequality.

We have been longstanding advocates for cognitive diversity in the companies in which we invest, and have spent a lot of time improving the gender balance of those companies, through both engagement and voting, with great success in the UK and in the US.

Our expectation is that companies set ambitions related to the ethnic composition of their organisation, throughout the workforce, with a particular emphasis at the board level, which generally sets the tone from the top.

For companies that fail to meet our transparent and rules-based minimum expectations, there will be voting and investment consequences.

We focus on the board, as this is where accountability for the issue belongs, and where we can have most influence as we are able to elect board members annually.

 

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Ben Watson: Rewiring the workplace for AI success – from tech to transformation

Despite major investment in AI, only 1% of organisations feel they’ve achieved successful, ‘mature’ adoption.

Joshua Wöhle: Why 73% of AI usage is still happening outside of work

OpenAI recently released the largest study of ChatGPT usage to date - 1.5 million conversations analysed. The headline? Less than 30% of usage is work-related.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you