HRreview Header

62% don’t have enough time to access all information needed for their job

-

A study conducted by AI-powered market research platform AMPLYFI exposes the pervasive challenge of “information overload,” hindering businesses’ ability to drive growth, serve customers, and identify risks.

The study reveals that 62 percent of knowledge workers acknowledge a shortage of time to access the essential information required for effective job performance, reflecting the escalating struggle with the exponential surge in data.

AMPLYFI’s comprehensive research aimed to quantify the impact of this information paralysis on businesses, as they dedicate more time to searching for data and less time executing their roles.

The study unveils that knowledge workers spend an average of 7.7 hours per week, equivalent to a full workday, searching for crucial information.

 

HRreview Logo

Get our essential daily HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Weekday HR updates. Unsubscribe anytime.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

 

Based on respondents’ average salaries, this amounts to an annual expenditure of £4.4 million for businesses in pursuit of insights and data essential for their operations.

Even after this extensive search, a significant 43 percent of decision-makers are unable to find the required resources on a weekly basis.

Paul Teather, CEO of AMPLYFI, commented on the study’s findings, emphasising the challenges posed by the rapid expansion of the internet and the resulting fragmentation of data. He stated, “Business leaders have a responsibility to provide more effective information gathering and storing processes for their workforce.”

Manual effort

Commissioned by AMPLYFI, independent research house Censuswide surveyed 1,500 decision-makers within businesses with a minimum of 250 employees.

The research further uncovered that 41 percent of knowledge workers keep between 6-10 tabs open in their internet browsers simultaneously, illustrating the significant manual effort invested in information search. Additionally, 57 percent of respondents reported encountering contradictions in data across different channels, creating uncertainty about which sources to trust.

Search engines (55%) emerged as the most common source of information, followed by networking and discussion (52%), and social media. Surprisingly, only 14 percent of respondents acknowledged accessing the deep web to aid business decision-making, despite it constituting approximately 90 percent of the internet.

Teather highlighted the consequences of neglecting the deep web, stating, “Omitting the deep web means teams are making critical decisions based on just a fraction of the information available.”

What about business risks?

Nearly half (48%) of decision-makers admitted that greater access to information could have prevented business risks at some point.

With streamlined research processes, respondents expressed their potential to drive business growth, enhance customer service, and identify ways to mitigate risks to the business.

Teather concluded optimistically, “AI is opening up new avenues for information gathering. Businesses can now harness a single source of information, conduct a lifetime of reading in 20 minutes, and create their own highly relevant content feeds, pulling from multiple sources across the internet. AI is ultimately allowing knowledge workers to put their fingerprint on the vast pool of data available.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Fiona Morgan: Ensuring fairness and transparency in AI-based recruitment

AI is having a huge impact on recruitment. But while it can improve efficiency, AI also raises legal, ethical and practical concerns.

Hiring slowdown shows signs of easing as permanent placements near stabilisation

Permanent hiring in the UK moves closer to stabilising as a decline in job placements slows and candidate numbers rise.

Jamie Dimon on the future of work

'Now's the time' to prepare for impact automation will have on workers.

Burnout drives workers to value balance over pay

High fatigue levels are influencing career choices, with most professionals saying flexibility and culture now outweigh salary in deciding where to work.
- Advertisement -

Alex Voakes: Flexible working isn’t just an office perk – it’s a public health necessity

It’s a sight which has become depressingly familiar: the overworked employee eating at their desk, skipping the opportunity to go for a walk.

Workplace sexism still widespread, survey finds

Two thirds of female employees say they are patronised by male colleagues, with many reporting stalled careers and pay disparitie

Must read

Arran Heal: How to avoid tribunals

At the core of the problem is how HR deal with workplace relationship issues, and even more fundamentally, the culture of how people deal with difficult conversations.

Emily Plosker: When social media in the workplace becomes a legal issue

It goes without saying that social media is now...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you