HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Job security and flexibility more important than salary, say employees

-

A new poll of over 1,000 employees* reveals that priorities have been realigned due to COVID – with job security and flexibility becoming main priorities for employees deciding whether to stay in their current role.

Law firm Winckworth Sherwood’s new report outlines that a significant proportion of workers believe job security and flexibility to be more important than salary when deciding whether to remain at their current company.

Over half (51 per cent) identified job security as the most important factor, owing to the uncertainty and disruptive nature of COVID-19 on the workplace. Similarly, two-fifths of respondents (40 per cent) felt flexibility was the main deciding factor, illustrating that COVID-19 has demonstrated the importance of work-life balance to staff.

Conversely, only a third of applicants (32 per cent) cited salary as the most important influence on staying at their current firm.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Despite remuneration falling in importance for staff, it was found that this was an area that employers failed to show transparency.

Less than a quarter of employers (22 per cent) had re-aligned executive pay in line with wider staff remuneration and job package cuts. In addition, where employees’ pay packages or bonuses had taken a hit, almost half (46 per cent) of all employers had not been transparent about executive pay.

As such, many employers recognised that there was more work to be done regarding communication – with only over a third of employers surveyed (38 per cent) feeling that they had ensured appropriate communication and engagement with employees during the pandemic.

Despite this, employees and employers alike felt that employers responded well to the circumstances brought about by the pandemic. However, employers were slightly more likely to rate themselves higher in this field with almost four in five employers (78 per cent) stating they had responded well. Conversely, under three-quarters of employees felt the same (73 per cent).

Louise Lawrence, Partner in the Employment Team at Winckworth Sherwood and report co-author, said:

Employers and employees alike have faced considerable challenges over the past twelve months, so it’s very encouraging to learn that the majority of employees still in work consider their employers to have handled the situation well.

Our research shows that for the most part, employers have taken an ethical approach, rather than trying to push through a new agenda when employees are feeling insecure and potentially prepared to accept detrimental changes. However, it is clear that there remains room for improvement, particularly in relation to engagement and communication with employees.

Harriet Calver, Senior Associate at Winckworth Sherwood and report co-author, added:

Employees currently have an increased focus on job security and flexibility in working arrangements and we consider that job security will remain a key priority for employees for some time, given that economic recovery won’t be instant after the restrictions are lifted.

Flexible working arrangements will also remain key as we believe there will be an expectation from employees that they can work more flexibly following a year of remote working during the pandemic. In the longer term, we expect to see a shift away from job security, as stability returns, and employees placing greater importance on the purpose, values and reputation of their employer.


*The research, which included a survey conducted by YouGov involving over 1,000 employees and 500 HR decision makers, took place between January – February 2021 drawing from a wide range of sectors and business sizes across the UK. This can be found in Winckworth Sherwood’s report ‘Ethical leadership in a time of crisis: How employers have responded to the pandemic and what this means for the future of work’. 

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Chris Moriarty: What can employers do to create a happy workforce?

In a market where the battle for talent is becoming increasingly competitive, employers are being dazzled by the appeal of sophisticated “wellness programmes” without considering the direct impact of a decade of under-investment in the physical workplace.

Southard Jones: Reading the data tea leaves – can HR help predict future business success?

Last year, Towers Watson found that one in three organisations planned to increase spend on their HR function by more than 20 percent, and HR data and analytics tools rated as one of the top areas for investment. However, just looking at HR data in isolation does not represent the best opportunity to make an impact.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you