Headscarves can be banned at work, EU court rules

-

The European Court of Justice has ruled that employers are entitled to ban workers from wearing headscarves to work.

The court ruled that any ban on the ‘visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign’ must be based on internal company rules requiring all employees to ‘dress neutrally’.

The ruling made clear that if the ban was only applied to Muslim members of staff it could still constitute discrimination.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Companies would need to already have a policy in place prohibiting the wearing of religious symbols and would not be able to ban staff from wearing headscarves on the “wishes of a customer”.

The case was brought by a Belgian receptionist who was fired for wearing a headscarf to work.

Samira Achbita, a receptionist for security company G4S, was dismissed after insisting on wearing her Islamic headscarf to work.

Ms Achbita challenged the decision in the Belgian courts, claiming she was being discriminated against on grounds of her religion.

Achbita claimed that she was being discriminated against on the grounds of her religion but the case was dismissed by two courts. The case was then referred to the European Court of Justice for clarification on what is banned by EU anti-discrimination laws.

Juliane Kokott, Advocate General to the European Court of Justice, said:

“While an employee cannot ‘leave’ their sex, skin colour, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age or disability at the door upon entering their employer’s premises, they may be expected to moderate the exercise of their religion in the workplace. Such a ban may be justified if it enables the employer to pursue the legitimate policy of ensuring religious and ideological neutrality.”

Bob Cordran, partner at the international law firm Dorsey & Whitney said:

“This case should be treated with extreme caution by employers, at least in the UK. It does not allow them simply to “ban headscarves”.

“In an age of ever-increasing awareness of diversity, inclusion and tolerance of difference in the workplace, this case appears to be a large backwards step. In truth it is no such thing, and will be of no assistance to an employer wanting to single out a particular religion or certain items of religious clothing in their dress code,” Cordran says.

“There is perhaps a danger of some employers seeing only the headlines and believing that this case allows the “banning” of headscarves or other signs of particular religions, when it really does not do that. What it does say is that in very specific circumstances, a complete ban on any visible political, philosophical or religious signs can be acceptable, but it will be a very rare employer– at least in the UK – which would feel the need to try to do this and risk not only indirect discrimination claims but also a very unhappy workforce,”

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Youth unemployment set to hit 17.8 percent, business group warns

The British Chambers of Commerce has warned that youth unemployment could rise sharply as weaker investment and higher costs weigh on hiring plans.

Athlete forced to drive 800 miles for meeting boss did not attend wins £149,000

The ruling raises wider questions about holiday pay calculations and workplace processes for personal trainers.

What today’s leaders can learn from Keir Starmer’s predicament

With our political figurehead beset by challenges, and challengers, on all sides, what can we learn about leadership for our times?

Nelson Sivalingam: Why developing AI ‘colleagues’ is a strategic imperative

AI needs constant sense-checking and human supervision because, just like people, it makes mistakes, sometimes with significant consequences.
- Advertisement -

Four-day week gains ground as companies report lower burnout and stable productivity

Employers trialling four-day working weeks reported lower burnout and stable productivity amid growing debate over AI and workplace stress.

Lack of time leaves workplace learning ‘squeezed out’

Heavy workloads and limited time are preventing many employees from taking part in workplace learning despite strong employer support for development.

Must read

Les Venus: Is it Fair?

Confidence is shaky, there are calls for radical change,...

Rebecca Hughes: Weaponising AI – how can employers respond?

An emerging trend that we are observing is that employees are using AI to raise formal workplace grievances and in litigating their claims.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you