Government’s apprenticeship levy is an ’empty promise’

-

Government’s apprenticeship levy branded a failure

The Government has been accused of making an empty promise when it comes to the apprenticeship levy as it comes to light that less than a third of levy paying employers say it will lead to an increase in the amount of money they are spending on training.

The CIPD conducted a report in to the apprenticeship levy called Addressing employer under-investment in training – the case for a broader training levy.

Only 31 per cent believe the levy will result in more being paid in to training. This number has fallen from 45 per cent in July 2017, showing people’s faith in the levy is decreasing over time, it was implemented in April 2017.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It was announced by then Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne in the July 2015 budget.

The Government’s apprenticeship levy, is a compulsory tax on employers to help fund the development and delivery of apprenticeships.

Employers with a paybill of more than £3 million are required to pay the levy, whether they employ an apprentice or not.

The vast majority (58 per cent) of levy paying employers believe the levy will have no impact on the amount of money they spend on training as well as 9 per cent saying it will actually lead to a reduction in training.

Aims of the levy were to increase the amount of apprenticeships and add to the amount of investment in workplace training, which was at a 20-year when it was introduced.

Both of these objectives have failed to hit there mark according to the report as skills investment in the majority of workplaces has fallen as well as fewer apprenticeships being invested in as the number of apprenticeships has fallen from 509,400 in 2015/16 to 375,800 in 2017/18.

Some companies (22 per cent) have also come forward saying that the levy money would have been spent on training irregardless of the levy. Also 15 per cent say that the scheme will give skills to employees they already have.

Certain employers (14 per cent) even said that the levy actually directs money away from other forms of training that are more necessary for their business.

The CIPD has suggested that the levy should cover employers with 50 employees or over in order to double the amount raised by the levy to £5 billion. They feel this will help address the fall in investment in this area.

Another idea the CIPD has put forward is to create a regional skills fund that will deal with skills challenges at a local level, helping smaller non-levy paying firms to invest in skills by providing better business support.

Lizzie Crowley, skills adviser at the CIPD, said:

Our research clearly shows the apprenticeship levy has failed to deliver what the Government said it would: more investment in workplace training.

For this to become a reality, we need to have a broader training levy that is much less prescriptive and gives employers more flexibility. This should also help to prevent employers from gaming the system as is currently the case.

With only 2 per cent of employers required to pay the apprenticeship levy, the money raised from it was never going to be enough to close the gap that’s been left by the long-term decline in training investment. Bu if we had more employers contributing, we could make up the shortfall and also help to boost regional investment in skills.

The CIPD report is based on 2,000 employers.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

NHS badge review raises wider questions about political expression at work

A government-backed NHS review has reignited debate over political symbols at work and how employers can balance protected beliefs with workplace conduct.

Andrew Fettes-Brown: Leading with curiosity – why the built environment needs a culture shift to allow for innovation

Curiosity creates the conditions for learning, growth and understanding. It encourages us to interrogate problems properly rather than rushing to solutions.

Mental health ‘stigma’ still stops staff speaking to managers

Most employees remain uncomfortable discussing mental health concerns with managers despite growing workplace wellbeing investment.

UK set for biggest rise in unemployment among G7 nations, OECD warns

Britain is forecast to record the largest rise in unemployment among G7 economies this year as economic growth slows and labour market conditions weaken.
- Advertisement -

UK employers ‘risk falling behind global rivals on AI hiring’

UK employers remain cautious about artificial intelligence in recruitment while overseas rivals move faster to adopt AI hiring tools.

Carly Jenner of Apeel Sciences

A global people leader shares how list-making, wellness routines and international teamwork shape her working day in HR.

Must read

Creating a cultural shift: how office furniture can support company culture

By rethinking the layout and design of the office, businesses can make beneficial changes to corporate culture, helping them to secure a skilled and happy workforce for years to come.

Tom Kerr Williams: Managing strike action

Most employers look to avoid industrial strike action wherever possible, but there comes a time in every unionised employer’s existence where such action is threatened.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you