TUC brands forced retirement advice ‘disappointing’

-

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has insisted that advice issued by an advocate general from the European court of justice on the issue of forced retirement is "disappointing" for employees.

Campaigners from an arm of the charity Age Concern had launched a legal battle to scrap compulsory retirement at the age of 65, insisting it breaches EU equality requirements.

But the advocate general rejected the claim, saying that discrimination on the grounds of age can be justified in certain circumstances.

Commenting on the ruling, TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said it is "hugely disappointing" for those employees who want or need to carry on working post-65.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

"It makes no sense that we have laws in the UK that aim to remove age discrimination, but include a get-out clause for employers who want to kick people out when they reach 65, regardless of whether or not they are doing their job well," he remarked.

According to Business Link, compulsory retirement below the age of 65 is unlawful unless employers can objectively justify their decision.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Sam Sprules: Planning for the long haul is the only way to weather the recruitment storm

So this year we reached a milestone at AeroProfessional, as we celebrated our tenth anniversary as a resourcing and HR consultancy.  In the last decade, we’ve placed over 1,500 candidates with over 160 aviation companies across the globe.

Colette Wade: Taking back your work day: four tips for recruitment hacking

In order to adapt to the candidate-led market we’re in, in-house recruiters must acquire better sourcing skills, personalise the process for hard-to-fill roles, and use more intense on-boarding processes to ensure offers convert to hires. This, however, takes a lot of time and effort. So, how do we overcome these problems? The answer is ‘recruitment hacking’.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you