Landmark £40m holiday pay case could have ‘major implications’ for flexible workers

-

In a ruling on the 4th of October, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has closed a significant legal loophole, potentially allowing hundreds of thousands of flexible workers in the UK to claim backdated holiday pay from their employers.

The decision follows a high-profile case in which over 3,700 police officers and civilian staff successfully claimed backdated holiday pay from their employer, the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), which had allegedly underpaid holiday pay dating back to 1998.

In 2019, the Court of Appeal upheld a tribunal’s decision that these workers were owed holiday pay, a decision that was later appealed by the PSNI but has now been dismissed by the Supreme Court.

The repercussions of this ruling are substantial, with estimates suggesting that the PSNI could face a financial burden of between £30 million to £40 million in backdated holiday pay claims. Notably, in Northern Ireland, claims can extend beyond the standard two-year limit applicable in the rest of the UK.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The ruling carries profound implications for workers in the umbrella and temporary employment sector. It stipulates that a gap of three months or more between underpayments of holiday pay does not break the chain of deductions.

Who can claim holiday pay?

Previously, a series of deductions could only be linked if there was no gap exceeding three months. This change means that more umbrella and temporary workers now have the opportunity to claim unreceived holiday pay from umbrella companies and recruitment agencies.

The impact of this decision is far-reaching, as it applies uniformly across the UK and Northern Ireland. Julia Kermode, CEO of PayePass, an umbrella company compliance expert, emphasised the potential significance of this ruling for the flexible working industry:

“This landmark judgment sends a very clear message to dubious umbrella companies and recruitment agencies who do not pay their workers holiday pay. These immoral operators are now at risk of claims for staggering sums of money which is legally owed to flexible workers.

“In simple terms, this case means that the 3-month window to claim underpayments is not enforceable, so unreceived holiday pay can be claimed back from employers dating back two years irrespective of whether they received it on and off. It could mean thousands to every temp and contractor who hasn’t received their holiday pay, and it could easily cost this industry billions.

“Whilst there are still currently legal loopholes allowing these companies to withhold holiday pay, they aren’t ethical – in fact, they’re completely immoral. Common sense has prevailed, and this Supreme Court ruling has closed one such loophole, shining the spotlight on holiday pay which, all too often, is withheld from workers who desperately need it.

“It’s shocking that profiteering through withholding holiday pay even goes on, and from our experience of auditing supply chains, we know that end-clients are usually totally unaware of it, even though it’s their money being redirected.

“But let’s not forget about all those who have missed out on vital income, and now have the opportunity to claim what is rightfully theirs. No doubt the legal eagles are already circling ready to support high-profile cases.”

This landmark ruling is expected to have far-reaching consequences, not only for flexible workers but also for the companies and agencies that employ them. It underscores the importance of upholding workers’ rights and ensuring fair compensation for all employees, regardless of their employment status.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Andrew Filev: Understanding the human impact of the Dark Matter of Work

‘Dark energy’ and ‘dark matter’ make up 95% of the universe and are essentially invisible. The same can be said for much of the work done by organisations today, argues Andrew Filev.

Dr Mark Winwood: Some employees will lie when they’re sick – but it’s not all dishonest

The first Monday of February has come to be known as ‘National Sickie Day’ – the day that employees are supposed to be most likely to call in sick. Employment law firm ELAS, which has promoted the notion, maintains that a combination of miserable weather, commuting in the dark, post-Christmas credit card bills and long gap between holidays makes the first Monday of February the day that people are most likely to take some unofficial time off.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you