Comments from the community: ban on exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts

-

New rules banning exclusivity clauses from zero hour contracts have come into effect today. This means that employers will not be able to prevent hourly staff from working for another employer.

The new laws were first suggested under the last government and supported by former business secretary Vince Cable. Any employer found preventing staff from working elsewhere could face legal implications under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment act.

Neil Carberry, CBI director for Employment and Skills, believes that a ban on exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts, “is a proportionate response to tackling examples of poor practice.”

 “But any further regulation must not damage our flexible labour market, which is an important success story of our economy, benefitting employers and employees alike.” Carberry says.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Thomas Eggar, associate and employment specialist Andrew Crudge, comments:

“You would struggle to find many people who are in favour of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts. Even employers generally accept that to limit an employee’s right to work for another employer, while not guaranteeing them a minimum number of hours work, is completely unreasonable.

“However, employers and employees are divided as to whether further changes are needed. Employers are frustrated by what they see as the constant chopping and changing of their employment law obligations. Although this is a relatively minor change, Employers could be caught out if they fail to review and update their existing zero hours contracts.

“The Liberal Democrats were the main drivers of the employment law reforms in the last government. Before the election, further legislation limiting the use of zero hours contracts appeared likely. However, these Labour and Liberal Democrat proposals are now unlikely to surface under the Conservative majority government. Good news for employers perhaps, but not for the huge number of individuals on zero hours contracts who want to work guaranteed and regular hours.”

Amie Filcher is an editorial assistant at HRreview.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Maria Rechkemmer: In an AI world, human language still leads – why multilingual teams are a business imperative

In an era defined by AI and rapid digital transformation, it’s easy to assume that human language skills might fade into the background. But quite the opposite is true.

Michelle Carson: Nigel Farage’s comments aren’t just naive – they’re dangerous

Nigel Farage claimed that people with neurodevelopmental differences may never “get out” of victimhood. This isn’t just misinformed rhetoric: it’s inflammatory and damaging.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you