Comments from the community: ban on exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts

-

New rules banning exclusivity clauses from zero hour contracts have come into effect today. This means that employers will not be able to prevent hourly staff from working for another employer.

The new laws were first suggested under the last government and supported by former business secretary Vince Cable. Any employer found preventing staff from working elsewhere could face legal implications under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment act.

Neil Carberry, CBI director for Employment and Skills, believes that a ban on exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts, “is a proportionate response to tackling examples of poor practice.”

 “But any further regulation must not damage our flexible labour market, which is an important success story of our economy, benefitting employers and employees alike.” Carberry says.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Thomas Eggar, associate and employment specialist Andrew Crudge, comments:

“You would struggle to find many people who are in favour of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts. Even employers generally accept that to limit an employee’s right to work for another employer, while not guaranteeing them a minimum number of hours work, is completely unreasonable.

“However, employers and employees are divided as to whether further changes are needed. Employers are frustrated by what they see as the constant chopping and changing of their employment law obligations. Although this is a relatively minor change, Employers could be caught out if they fail to review and update their existing zero hours contracts.

“The Liberal Democrats were the main drivers of the employment law reforms in the last government. Before the election, further legislation limiting the use of zero hours contracts appeared likely. However, these Labour and Liberal Democrat proposals are now unlikely to surface under the Conservative majority government. Good news for employers perhaps, but not for the huge number of individuals on zero hours contracts who want to work guaranteed and regular hours.”

Amie Filcher is an editorial assistant at HRreview.

Latest news

Curtis Holmes: Payroll is the driver for employee engagement

Payroll has long been treated as a back-office necessity: essential, but not something that shapes culture or drives engagement. This no longer stands.

Labour market yet to show major AI impact on jobs, govt adviser says

A government economic adviser has challenged predictions of widespread AI-driven unemployment, arguing labour market data has yet to show disruption.

Young workers ‘pressured into signing NDAs after workplace injuries’

Workers say injuries are being hidden behind confidentiality agreements while financial pressures leave many afraid to challenge unsafe conditions.

CIPD recognises 30 HR leaders driving change across UK workplaces

The CIPD has unveiled its HR30 list for 2026, recognising senior people leaders whose work has delivered measurable impact across organisations and workforces.
- Advertisement -

Brits dream of being their own boss, but still cling to the monthly pay cheque, survey reveals

Britons say they like the idea of self-employment, but most still value the security and stability of traditional jobs.

AI Coaching Won’t Replace Managers. It Will Expose Coaching Debt.

As AI coaching expands, employers may gain a clearer view of where manager support is falling short.

Must read

Matthew Sanders: Zero hour contracts – good for nobody

Recent media buzz about the use of zero hour...

Power to the people: how to upskill a workforce

In the build up to October's Talent Management &...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you