Businesses to get their say on efficacy of appeals process

-

Employment Law BasicsBusiness Minister, Michael Fallon, has confirmed that a review of the way appeals are handled by regulators will form the first stage of ‘bureaucracy-busting measures’ designed to reduce red tape on business.

The Focus on Enforcement Appeals Review will allow businesses and other interested parties to take part in a review of the effectiveness of appeals mechanisms operated by national and local regulators, and will give those affected the opportunity to talk about their experiences of formal and informal appeals processes, and suggest how they could be made to work more effectively, providing a swifter route to resolution and better industry understanding.

The review will also gather examples of approaches that have successfully helped businesses understand regulators’ decisions and meet their obligations more effectively.

Business Minister, Michael Fallon, said:

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“We have started a bonfire of excessive red tape, but I know that it is just as important that we look at the way that Regulations are enforced.

“There is room for far more effective enforcement which reduces the burden on business which stick to the rules. Despite best efforts, sometimes things can go wrong – that has become clear from previous Focus on Enforcement Reviews. So I want to hear views on how we can improve the way appeals currently work.

“Greater clarity and trust between regulators and businesses will lead to better enforcement of the law and higher standards across the board.”

As Mr Fallon indicated, evidence arising from sector-specific Focus on Enforcement reviews has already indicated that businesses have concerns about how current appeals systems operate. These include confusing or multiple appeals mechanisms, a lack of transparency, and in some cases resolution taking excessively long periods of time.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Elie Rashbass: AI and culture – a new era of embedding values in the workplace

Organisational culture is poised to remain a top five priority for HR leaders in 2025. Could artificial intelligence unlock new solutions?

Antoine Andrews: DEI can’t thrive without accountability

"If we reflect inward and look a bit deeper than the highest level, we can see that accountability is more than just owning up to your mistakes and missteps, or completing your work on time."
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you