Amendment proposed to prevent minor youth convictions to be disclosed to employers

-

Amendment proposed to prevent minor youth convictions to be disclosed to employers

The Government has proposed an amendment on 09/07/20, which would mean minor and youth convictions do not have to be disclosed to employers.

If this amendment is passed in to law, then people who have a minor conviction when they were a child, can apply for jobs knowing their past convictions will not be brought up via checks by the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS).

In January 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that minor and youth convictions should not be disclosed, as it breaches the human rights of children who receive cautions, as it prevents the child from rehabilitating.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

In this case in 2019, P and Others v SSHD & SSJ the Government was defeated in the Supreme Court. As one of the claimants explained how she struggled to get a job as a teaching assistant due to two offences. Shoplifting a sandwich and a book costing 99p whilst suffering from undiagnosed schizophrenia.

This law would overturn the “multiple conviction” rule, which means a person must disclose to employers if they have more than one conviction. Despite the extent of the conviction.

Victoria Atkins, minister for safeguarding, believes this move would help to increase ex-offenders’ employability. This amendment could take away any minor offences from their past that could impact their future.

Ms Atkins said:

By making these adjustments, we will ensure that vulnerable people are protected from dangerous offenders while those who have turned their lives around or live with the stigma of convictions from their youth are not held back.

In a letter to Unlock a charity for people with criminal records from Ms Atkins and Chris Philp minister for Immigration Compliance and the courts, explained that if this motion is turned in to law  it will “amend the disclosure (filtering) rules that mandate which convictions and cautions must be disclosed for certain sensitive roles.”

“The draft orders will amend the relevant provisions of the Police Act 1997 and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975.” Employees will no longer have to disclose:

  • Youth reprimands and warnings (an out of court disposal issued to under 18s. These were replaced by youth cautions in 2013)
  • All convictions where a person has more than one conviction (convictions which are for offences specified on a list of serious offences, which received a custodial sentence, or unspent convictions will continue to be disclosed under other rules).

 

Christopher Stacey, co-director of Unlock, said:

We welcome the Government’s intention to fully comply with the Supreme Court ruling on filtering. Unlock intervened in that vital case because we know thousands of people are unnecessarily anchored to their past due to an arbitrary regime which forces the disclosure of old and irrelevant information.

However, we are still left with a criminal records system where many people with old and minor criminal records are shut out of jobs that they are qualified to do… The Government’s plan for jobs should include a wider review of the criminal records disclosure system to ensure all law-abiding people with criminal records are able to move on into employment and contribute to our economic recovery.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Isaac Getz: The French paradox: How France is ‘liberating’ its employees

Within a liberated company, employees enjoy freedom to take any action that they—not their supervisors or procedures —decide are the best for the company’s vision. Professor Isaac Getz discusses freedom and leadership at work.

Sam Sprules: Making assumptions when recruiting or relocating staff overseas can be costly

For any business that operates internationally, there is a much bigger HR issue to consider than simply finding the right candidate.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you