HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Employers must not ask about EU settlement status, lawyers warn

-

A law firm offers a stark warning to employers regarding questioning an employee’s EU settlement status. 

As it currently stands, if an employee is an EU, EEA or Swiss citizen, they are eligible to apply for the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) which allows workers and their families to continue living in the UK after 30th June 2021 – when the scheme ends.

However, the city law firm, Bates Wells, offers a firm reminder to employers regarding what they cannot ask.

According to guidance from the Home Office, employers cannot yet ask employees about their status under the EUSS, as EU nationals still have until June 30th to apply.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

If an employer does ask, the law firm warns, this could lead to claims of discrimination on the basis of country of origin.

However, Bates Wells found that, in order to circumvent discrimination claims, this may lead to employers choosing to avoid hiring EU nationals as they are not privy to the information which tells them whether the employee is entitled to remain in the UK.

EU nationals may present their European passport or national identity card as proof of their eligibility to work in the UK up until June 30th. From July 1st they will need to be able to prove that they have been granted settled status or that their application is being processed.

This means that after, 1st July, it is expected that UK employers will be obliged to check the status of EU employees and may face prosecution if they do not. If an employee is found to have not applied for status under the EUSS or does not have proof of their right to work in the UK, their employment must be terminated.

Bates Wells states that employers who hire EU workers could incur significant recruitment costs and disruption if they are then forced to let them go just months later if it transpires that they do not have settled status.

Victoria Cook, Senior Associate in Bates Wells’ Employment practice says:

Employers will need to tread extremely carefully. Probing questions during recruitment could leave them vulnerable to claims that they have discriminated against candidates on the basis of their nationality.

Ironically, this could inadvertently lead to employers choosing to ‘filter out’ candidates from EU countries rather than run the risk of a claim.

Chetal Patel, Partner in Bates Wells’ Immigration practice adds:

Right to Work obligations force businesses to operate as de facto immigration officers. Brexit has only added to the administrative burden.

Hiring and training employees only to be forced to fire them in a matter of mere months would incur significant costs, which businesses can ill afford in these difficult times.


*Bates Wells, founded in 1970, is a professional services firm that works for a wide range of businesses, social enterprises, charities, institutions, public bodies and high-profile individuals, across a variety of sectors.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Ally Fekaiki: Employee benefits: how to fix the one common HR practice employees hate

Employee benefits famously a pain point for HRs and hated by employees. Amidst record level vacancies, they've also become key ammunition to entice talent, with companies constantly announcing new perks.

Gerry O’Neill: Gender pay and the calculus of inequality

Recently, we were privileged to have Duncan Brown, from the Institute for Employment Studies, speak at one of our Curo Coffee & Comp events. The theme was around equal pay reporting and his talk was entitled ‘Addressing Unequal Pay: Opening Pandora’s Box.’ What was clear to all was that there is no doubt that when the lid is lifted off the Pandora’s Box that is gender pay next year many evils will fly out, but it is also true that hope will be left. There will be far reaching consequences but will they necessarily be detrimental?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you