Employers must not ask about EU settlement status, lawyers warn

-

A law firm offers a stark warning to employers regarding questioning an employee’s EU settlement status. 

As it currently stands, if an employee is an EU, EEA or Swiss citizen, they are eligible to apply for the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) which allows workers and their families to continue living in the UK after 30th June 2021 – when the scheme ends.

However, the city law firm, Bates Wells, offers a firm reminder to employers regarding what they cannot ask.

According to guidance from the Home Office, employers cannot yet ask employees about their status under the EUSS, as EU nationals still have until June 30th to apply.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

If an employer does ask, the law firm warns, this could lead to claims of discrimination on the basis of country of origin.

However, Bates Wells found that, in order to circumvent discrimination claims, this may lead to employers choosing to avoid hiring EU nationals as they are not privy to the information which tells them whether the employee is entitled to remain in the UK.

EU nationals may present their European passport or national identity card as proof of their eligibility to work in the UK up until June 30th. From July 1st they will need to be able to prove that they have been granted settled status or that their application is being processed.

This means that after, 1st July, it is expected that UK employers will be obliged to check the status of EU employees and may face prosecution if they do not. If an employee is found to have not applied for status under the EUSS or does not have proof of their right to work in the UK, their employment must be terminated.

Bates Wells states that employers who hire EU workers could incur significant recruitment costs and disruption if they are then forced to let them go just months later if it transpires that they do not have settled status.

Victoria Cook, Senior Associate in Bates Wells’ Employment practice says:

Employers will need to tread extremely carefully. Probing questions during recruitment could leave them vulnerable to claims that they have discriminated against candidates on the basis of their nationality.

Ironically, this could inadvertently lead to employers choosing to ‘filter out’ candidates from EU countries rather than run the risk of a claim.

Chetal Patel, Partner in Bates Wells’ Immigration practice adds:

Right to Work obligations force businesses to operate as de facto immigration officers. Brexit has only added to the administrative burden.

Hiring and training employees only to be forced to fire them in a matter of mere months would incur significant costs, which businesses can ill afford in these difficult times.


*Bates Wells, founded in 1970, is a professional services firm that works for a wide range of businesses, social enterprises, charities, institutions, public bodies and high-profile individuals, across a variety of sectors.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

David Roberts: The psychology of a savings pot – and how employers can help

Money doesn’t necessarily make people happy. But financial stress will certainly make people unhappy - and a savings pot can help.

Catharine Geddes: Workplace romance – what employers need to know

With Valentine’s Day today, those looking for love may...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you