Twitter quietly removes policy on misgendering trans employees

-

In an update to its content moderation guidelines, Twitter has removed a policy that banned the targeted misgendering of transgender people.

This policy, which focused on restricting harmful content, stated in 2018 that repeatedly calling a transgender person by the wrong pronouns violated Twitter’s rules.

The policy included the “targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”

However, in a change made in April, this policy has been removed.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

GLAAD has condemned the removal of the policy, calling it the latest in a series of changes that have made the platform more susceptible for users to receive online harassment.

“Twitter’s hateful conduct policy protected trans people from targeted misgendering and deadnaming for close to five years, and now they mysteriously removed it without a word,” said GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis.

“This is unacceptable in any climate, and doubly unacceptable when you look at the barrage of disinformation and hate about trans people from right-wing media personalities, politicians, and the extremists they bolster.”

Milena Berry, CEO of PowerToFly, the award-winning diversity recruiting and retention platform, believes this can be a catastrophic decision for corporate America: 

“Policy is the bedrock of workplace culture and safety. For top-ranked companies to deliberately remove policies that protect individuals is not just a disservice to the mindset America was built on, but will hurt the company in the long run.

“Customers and employees want to support and work for companies that make decisions based on openness, kindness and respect. It’s that simple.”

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Jeanette Wheeler: Your transformation programmes are stalling on alignment, not budget

Most leaders assume their next big change programme will succeed or fail based on budget or the right technology. Those things are rarely what stops progress.

Return to the office ‘has not rebuilt workplace connections’

Research suggests increased office attendance has not restored workplace relationships, with many employees continuing to experience loneliness and disconnection.

Sheila Attwood on the cost-of-living squeeze

"Employers are under pressure to go further to support employee living standards."

NHS plans rewards for 30-minute daily walking challenge

New incentives are designed to encourage healthier habits and increase physical activity as part of England's 10-year health plan.
- Advertisement -

England’s overnight World Cup clash and 5am pub opening prompt CIPD advice

The CIPD is urging organisations to agree any flexibility before England's 1am World Cup last-16 tie to help minimise disruption at the start of the working week.

Russell Cowley: Gen Z – rebuilding workplace culture, break by break

Gen Z workers are taking proper breaks and in doing so, they may be fixing something the rest of us broke.

Must read

Chris Welford: Merger, Takeover or Invasion?

Picture this – an ailing enterprise is being rescued...

MAC report isn’t a crowd pleaser for businesses

Published with the aim of informing migration policy after Brexit, the recommendations set out in the Government’s MAC (Migration Advisory Committee) report, which have been given an initial nod of approval by the cabinet, are essentially giving to the UK economy with one hand and taking away with the other.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you