Why is there still a gender bonus gap?

-

Gender inequality can still be seen in bonuses for UK workers, according to new research from online investment platform Rplan.co.uk.

The study, which surveyed 1,108 UK adults, reveals that nearly three in 10 (29%) British workers – 14.6 million people – will share a total of £23.28 billion in bonuses, but it also demonstrates a clear gender gap, with 32 percent of men saying that they have had or expect to receive a bonus compared to 24 percent of women.

Stuart Dyer, CIO at Rplan.co.uk, says this is due to different working cultures for each gender:

“Several studies have shown that men find it easier to move jobs for promotions, can be more aggressive in pushing for bonuses and don’t have the same career interruptions that women often have. As much as there has been greater awareness of inequality in the workplace and action to address it, our research shows change is still needed to close the gender bonus gap.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The implication is that women are often held back by taking long periods of leave to have children. Now that there is the option for both parents to apply for shared parental leave we might find that the gender gap for promotions and rewards begins to decrease.

While the £23.28 billion sum equates to £1,663 per person Rplan.co.uk’s study also suggests that gender isn’t the only dividing factor in the amounts received. 45,000 people expect to receive more than £50,000 each and, in total, nearly 137,000 people will receive over £10,000.

The age group most likely to be in line for a bonus was the 35-44s, of which 38 percent said they had or would receive one. Other groups included 25-34 (33%); 45-54 (26%); 18-24 (20%) 55-64 (19%) and 65+ (18%).

Steff joined the HRreview editorial team in November 2014. A former event coordinator and manager, Steff has spent several years working in online journalism. She is a graduate of Middlessex University with a BA in Television Production and will complete a Master's degree in Journalism from the University of Westminster in the summer of 2015.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Jessica Bass: What the Employment Rights Act means for HR leaders  

The Employment Rights Act represent a major shift in employment law - one that will increase cost and legal risk for employers.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you