More than a million women still keep period sick days a secret

-

In a study conducted by the Bupa Wellbeing Index, it has come to light that over a million women choose to conceal the true reason behind their sick days, opting not to disclose their period-related symptoms to their employers.

The survey, reflecting the experiences of women in the workforce, exposes the challenges women face in openly discussing menstrual health issues at the workplace.

The statistics show that a significant portion, 35 percent, of women feel compelled to conceal the real cause when taking a sick day due to severe period symptoms.

The reluctance to disclose is attributed to various factors, with 45 percent unsure if period-related symptoms are considered a valid reason to call in sick, 34 percent feeling embarrassed, and 31 percent expressing concerns that their employers will not understand.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Annually, a staggering 16.7 million sick days are taken due to symptoms linked to periods, averaging five days per woman. Despite the prevalence of severe period pain, nausea, headaches, and migraines among women, only 19 percent openly admit to taking a sick day specifically for period-related reasons.

Powering through the pain

A disheartening 42 percent of women choose to power through their pain, reporting feelings of exhaustion, discomfort, and frequent bathroom trips due to heavy bleeding. The reluctance to take sick leave is fuelled by the belief that a period is not a valid enough reason (45%), embarrassment (34%), and the fear of being misunderstood by employers (31%).

Moreover, when women do take time off due to period-related symptoms, a concerning 35 percent provide an alternate reason for their absence, highlighting a persistent stigma surrounding the issue. This trend echoes Bupa data from six years ago, indicating a lack of progress in dispelling the stigma around discussing periods in the workplace.

The silence around periods in workplaces appears to contribute to the ongoing stigma, as 38 percent of women reveal that periods are not discussed at all in their workplace. Furthermore, in companies where period health is addressed, 23 percent of women report negative discussions on the subject.

The impact of severe period symptoms on productivity is significant, with women requiring an average of five sick days per year. Across the UK, this translates to nearly 17 million sick days taken annually for period-related reasons.

Is flexible working the answer?

Addressing these challenges, Sarah Melia, General Manager at Bupa Health Services, emphasises the need for companies to cultivate a workplace culture where women feel comfortable discussing their experiences openly. She advocates for education, flexible working, and access to healthcare services, citing the recently launched Bupa Period Plan as a step towards supporting women in managing heavy and painful periods.

Melia states, “Women make up 48 percent of the UK workforce, and it’s essential we support them to thrive. Our Bupa Period Plan, offered free to all our colleagues at Bupa, underscores our commitment to providing necessary support for our people, ensuring they can access the care they need when they need it.”

The survey also highlights a lack of awareness about period-related symptoms, with 18 percent of women suggesting the need for more training for managers. Women express a desire for concrete period health policies in the workplace, including free sanitary products (36%), clearly signposted days off for period health (30%), and access to services supporting periods, such as GP appointments (19%).

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Workplace belonging ‘rises to highest level in a decade’, but many workers still feel excluded

Most UK employees now feel a sense of belonging at work, but many still do not feel consistently valued or included.

Workers turning down jobs over company reputation as Gen Z demands values match

Younger workers are increasingly rejecting employers over company culture, leadership behaviour and reputation before interviews even begin.

Bill Winters on ‘lower-value human capital’

“It’s not cost-cutting. It’s replacing in some cases lower-value human capital with the financial capital and the investment capital we’re putting in.”

Half of UK workers say their jobs are damaging their health

Rising levels of stress, fatigue and inactivity are affecting workers across the UK, with growing concern over long-term health and job performance.
- Advertisement -

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Must read

Toby Mildon: Navigating the diversity and inclusion iceberg

Toby Mildon provides an analysis of the lack of diversity in our Government in his explanation of the 'diversity and inclusion iceberg'.

Health & Safety on a Budget

There are often agonised groans from people and organisations having to pay to comply with the law. Lawrence Waterman investigates.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you