FTSE 100 boards hit gender target but miss BAME

-

FTSE 100 boards hit gender target but miss BAME

A third of all FTSE 100 board positions are now held by women, a government-backed target that has been hit almost a year early, this follows the news that the same companies are most likely to miss their Black, Asian & Minority Ethnic (BAME) targets by 2021. 

The Hampton-Alexander Review has revealed that women make up 33 per cent of FTSE 100 boards, with Andrea Leadsom, the business secretary stating this is “fantastic work” especially considering the review has been achieved on an entirely voluntary basis and no legislation has been enforced.

Also, two-thirds (66 per cent) of HR directors are women at FTSE 100 companies, the highest amount of females in a part of the businesses. The FTSE 250 female at board level currently sits at 29.5 per cent.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, the review also found that women are less represented in senior positions and key executive roles.

The Global Institute for Women Leadership at King’s College London also shows women are facing everyday sexism in the workplace, with examples including higher reports of insults or angry outbursts directed at women compared to men.

King’s College surveyed almost 350 men and women at board or executive committee level and found that:

  • 33 per cent of women reported someone at work had made disrespectful or insulting remarks about them, compared to 13 per cent of men
  • 23 per cent of women reported that they had been shouted or sworn at by someone at work, compared to 16 per cent of men
  • 34 per cent of women reported someone at work had ignored or failed to speak to them, or given them the “silent treatment” compared to 23 per cent of men
  • 39 per cent of women reported being targeted by angry outbursts or “temper tantrums” by someone at work, compared to 23 per cent of men.

 

Andrea Leadsom, Business Secretary, said:

The Hampton-Alexander Review has done fantastic work.

But it’s clear that women continue to face barriers to success, whether that’s through promotion to key roles or how they are treated by colleagues.

Businesses must do more to tackle these issues and we will support them in doing so, including through our world leading reforms to workplace rights.

Denise Wilson, CEO of Hampton-Alexander Review, said:

Half of all available appointments to FTSE 350 leadership roles need to go to women in 2020, not only to meet the 33 per cent voluntary target, but to ensure UK business fully benefits from diverse perspectives and is availing itself of the whole talent pool.

Dr Jill Miller, diversity and inclusion adviser at the CIPD, said:

Reaching the target set in the Hampton-Alexander review a year early shows strides are being made with female representation in UK boardrooms.

But beneath the headline figures, there is still much work needed – not least with addressing the imbalance between female representation in executive roles compared with non-executive positions. Women are still underrepresented in operational roles which have day-to-day influence on the organisation culture and decision-making power.

Occupational segregation is also clearly apparent in the top jobs and needs to be addressed through long-term investment in talent pipelines, as well as through identifying the barriers preventing women reaching those top leadership positions.

Interested in diversity and inclusion. We recommend the Diversity & Inclusion Conference 2020.

Darius is the editor of HRreview. He has previously worked as a finance reporter for the Daily Express. He studied his journalism masters at Press Association Training and graduated from the University of York with a degree in History.

Latest news

Kevin Chan: Escaping the artificial AI talent crisis

The application of AI to traditional business processes has led to a massive shake-up of the employment market.

University no longer pays for everyone as employers back apprenticeships

Lifetime returns from higher education are becoming more uneven as employers place growing value on vocational routes into work.

CIPD Insight: October’s employment law reforms demand action now

October will bring new trade union access rights, tougher anti-harassment duties and fresh obligations for employers. Here’s how HR can prepare now.

Employers plan smaller pay rises for 2027 despite inflation uncertainty

Early forecasts suggest organisations are becoming more cautious on reward budgets as cost pressures persist and economic conditions remain uncertain.
- Advertisement -

Employees opting for home working ‘to escape noisy offices’

More employees are choosing to work from home to avoid noisy workplaces, with many saying office distractions are affecting concentration.

The org chart isn’t dying. It’s being demoted.

AI is changing how companies organise work, raising questions about middle managers, accountability and workplace governance.

Must read

Yvonne Humphries: How Google’s perks alleviate stress and boost employees’ morale

It is no secret that working for Google has...

Darren Maw: How the Labour leadership contest will change HR

Two months ago, a huge political event caused debate around employment laws and the EU’s influence on them. In the politically tumultuous weeks that followed the referendum, a new campaign has cast worker’s rights back into the spotlight. The Labour leadership contest between Jeremy Corbyn and Owen Smith is a battle for the support of the left-wing and trade unions, with much of the campaigning focused on bolstering employee and trade union rights.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you