EHRC Set to Lose Discrimination Case Work Funding

-

Beginning in April 2012, the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s funding to pursue discrimination cases will stop. All cases concerning human rights and equality issues received by the organisation will be referred to legal aid. Most Equality and Human Rights Commission clients are not eligible for legal aid and are not able to privately pay for legal representation. Only 29% of the adults in England and Wales meet eligibility requirements for legal aid, and legal aid provides limited pre-tribunal support and does not fund tribunal advocacy or legal advice for individuals experiencing discrimination. Fewer cases dealing with discrimination of age, race, gender, belief, sexual orientation, or disability will make it to trial. It is difficult to bring a privately funded discrimination suit to court, and lack of justice in these legal cases will lead to the weakening of the Equality Act.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has protected equal rights in the past by providing legal advice, funding legal representation with grants, and intervening in many court cases. In Boyle versus SCA Packaging Limited, the EHRC helped fight to extend protections of disabled people to people who had reoccurring conditions that were currently under control. Elizabeth Boyle, who worked for SCA Packaging Ltd, had to have several surgeries for reoccurring nodules on her vocal chords. To prevent the nodules from returning, she had to follow a strict programme that included not raising her voice. SCA Packaging wanted to move her to a noisier environment. She filed a complaint to seek a reasonable accommodation due to her disability. SCA argued that since she was not currently ill, she was not disabled and not entitled to any accommodation. The Judicial Committee of the House of Lords ruled that a person whose chronic condition was currently in remission or managed was still disabled under the law.

The Commission has also successfully intervened in “due regard” cases such as the one involving the London Borough of Haringey. On appeal, it was found that the local authority of Haringey had violated the Race Relations Act of 1976 by failing to consider the fact that minority communities would be predominately affected by the plans to demolish housing for redevelopment. In January 2012, the Equality and Human Rights Commission funded the first cases of age discrimination to be heard by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The two cases will clarify an exception to the law that bans age discrimination by employers if it is a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”. The Commission has also intervened in cases where same sex couples joined in a civil union were not afforded the same rights as married couples. One such case involved discrimination against Stephen Preddy and Martyn Hall by a bed and breakfast in Cornwall that refused service to unmarried couples. The Court of Appeal found that there is no material difference between marriage and a civil partnership.

Funding allows important cases like these to be heard in court. An e-petition has been created to let the government know that funds for equality and human rights casework need to be arranged.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Daniel Creigh: The future of HR is video communications

Read about the six reasons why HR should implement video communications.

Hannah Crawley: Graduates need an escape from traditional assessment

Nationwide is now assessing the competencies and potential of graduates in a more engaging and meaningful way, says Hannah Crawley.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you