EHRC Set to Lose Discrimination Case Work Funding

-

Beginning in April 2012, the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s funding to pursue discrimination cases will stop. All cases concerning human rights and equality issues received by the organisation will be referred to legal aid. Most Equality and Human Rights Commission clients are not eligible for legal aid and are not able to privately pay for legal representation. Only 29% of the adults in England and Wales meet eligibility requirements for legal aid, and legal aid provides limited pre-tribunal support and does not fund tribunal advocacy or legal advice for individuals experiencing discrimination. Fewer cases dealing with discrimination of age, race, gender, belief, sexual orientation, or disability will make it to trial. It is difficult to bring a privately funded discrimination suit to court, and lack of justice in these legal cases will lead to the weakening of the Equality Act.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has protected equal rights in the past by providing legal advice, funding legal representation with grants, and intervening in many court cases. In Boyle versus SCA Packaging Limited, the EHRC helped fight to extend protections of disabled people to people who had reoccurring conditions that were currently under control. Elizabeth Boyle, who worked for SCA Packaging Ltd, had to have several surgeries for reoccurring nodules on her vocal chords. To prevent the nodules from returning, she had to follow a strict programme that included not raising her voice. SCA Packaging wanted to move her to a noisier environment. She filed a complaint to seek a reasonable accommodation due to her disability. SCA argued that since she was not currently ill, she was not disabled and not entitled to any accommodation. The Judicial Committee of the House of Lords ruled that a person whose chronic condition was currently in remission or managed was still disabled under the law.

The Commission has also successfully intervened in “due regard” cases such as the one involving the London Borough of Haringey. On appeal, it was found that the local authority of Haringey had violated the Race Relations Act of 1976 by failing to consider the fact that minority communities would be predominately affected by the plans to demolish housing for redevelopment. In January 2012, the Equality and Human Rights Commission funded the first cases of age discrimination to be heard by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The two cases will clarify an exception to the law that bans age discrimination by employers if it is a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”. The Commission has also intervened in cases where same sex couples joined in a civil union were not afforded the same rights as married couples. One such case involved discrimination against Stephen Preddy and Martyn Hall by a bed and breakfast in Cornwall that refused service to unmarried couples. The Court of Appeal found that there is no material difference between marriage and a civil partnership.

Funding allows important cases like these to be heard in court. An e-petition has been created to let the government know that funds for equality and human rights casework need to be arranged.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Daniel Stander: Is it lawful for employees to take on a second job?

"From time to time, a second job may pose risks to an employer, including conflicts of interest, absence issues, leaks of confidential information and reputational damage".

Nick Owen: Diversity beyond the obvious, could we do more to widen inclusion?

Nick Owen looks at going beyond the obvious conventions of inclusion and delves deeper into the culture of a company and how employers should be employing the right candidate for the job and not someone who fits into a 'pigeon hole'.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you