A fifth of older workers forced to delay retirement due to COVID-19

-

A significant proportion of older workers have been forced to delay their retirement due to COVID-19 and a lack of financial preparedness. 

According to a new report by Close Brothers, just under one-fifth of workers aged between 65-74 and one in seven (14 per cent) aged between 55-64 have delayed their retirement plans in light of the pandemic.

These figures were attributed to a lack of financial preparedness, with a fifth of workers who are approaching retirement age admitting to not having an accessible savings fund for an occasion such as this.

It was workers in the 55-64 age group which were most likely to express the fact that they were financially unprepared (16 per cent). In contrast, only 5 per cent of employees aged 65-74 shared this sentiment.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

However, young workers aged between 18-34 were the least prepared overall among the groups surveyed with a quarter (24 per cent) confessing that they were not financially ready for COVID-19.

As such, many employees have taken steps to fix this with three-quarters of employees (73 per cent) within the youngest age bracket saying they have made a change or plan to make a change to their financial preparedness. This was similarly reported by two in five (38 per cent) workers aged between 65-74 and almost half of workers (43 per cent) aged 55-64.

In light of this, confidence amongst employees regarding financial wellbeing is slowly increasing. A third of UK workers are more confident about weathering a fresh financial storm compared to before the pandemic (30 per cent).

Jeanette Makings, Head of Financial Education at Close Brothers commented:

The COVID-19 pandemic risks being a ‘sliding doors’ moment for UK employees and their employers. It has impacted financial health in a multitude of ways, with some suffering hardship, some having to postpone long held plans and others benefitting and adding to savings.

At the forefront of those best able to help employees improve their financial health are their employers; they are trusted, they can reach large numbers of people via the workplace, they already offer rewards and benefits that can be used to improve financial wellbeing and both employee and  business performance will benefit from improved financial health.

Understanding employees financial health as a whole, and knowing those that need most help, has to be the starting point to ensure that an inclusive, effective, and targeted financial wellbeing programme is implemented. A single channel, ‘one size fits all’ financial wellbeing approach is likely to fail many.

This has also been championed by the CIPD who, in their own research, found that half of employers do not have a financial wellbeing policy. The body outlined that a financial wellbeing policy should contain signposting to financial wellbeing advice, targeted financial education and revising benefits packages to include finance-friendly initiatives.


*Data was obtained from Close Brothers’ report ‘Expecting the unexpected’. This is based on a survey carried out on behalf of Close Brothers by Opinium. The sample was 2,000 UK based employees working for companies with 200 or more workers. The research was carried out between 22nd and 28th January 2021.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Alexander Passler: How can you create a workspace that caters to diverse professional needs?

"Did you know that disengaged employees cost the global economy $8.8 trillion dollars, or 9% of global GDP, annually?"

Richard Holmes: What does the new British Standard for workplace menopause and menstrual health support mean?

The British Standards Institute (BSI) has launched a new standard – BS30416 – to help employers manage menopause and menstrual health in the workplace, as well as to retain women in the workplace for longer.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you