Corbyn’s reshuffle woes – Is internal argument constructive or damaging to a leader’s credibility?

-

corbyn
The sage of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, is facing disloyalty in his top team. Is internal argument constructive or damaging to a leader’s credibility?

Turbulent cabinet reshuffles, be they shadow or otherwise, are not always a stroll in the park. Tony Blair, the New Labour St. Paul, famously bungled a cabinet reshuffle in 2003. The former premier was ripped to shreds for appointing John Reid, a Scottish MP with a Scottish constituency, to run the health service in England. In 1981, a botched re-shuffle prompted the Guardian to declare Margaret Thatcher ‘a diminishing force’, a prediction that was proved somewhat wide of the mark.

So Jeremy Corbyn can take heart as his fellow politicos and members of the press savage his latest attempt to re-order his team. Nevertheless, there are lessons to be drawn from Corbyn’s trials. The fact that the re-shuffle dragged on for a number of days and resulted in barely any movement within his top team suggests that his power as a manager, as the chairman of the Labour Party’s board, is limited to say the least.

Barnstorming

The Labour leader’s failure to remove Hilary Benn from shadow foreign affairs, for example, despite Benn’s barnstorming speech in the Commons, which barraged Corbyn’s own opposition against the bombing of Syria is a case in point. Corbyn also failed to remove Maria Eagle who has consistently contradicted the leader’s position on the renewing of Trident, the UK’s nuclear deterrent. Corbyn appears to be a manager who simply cannot manage, a man who cannot impose his own vision on his own top team.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Many within the HR community would argue that disagreement is to be encouraged. It broadens debate and it encourages the airing of new ideas. It can also act to speed up the diagnosis of problems within an organisation. Of course ego will sometimes get in they way, it certainly will in politics and it will, more than likely, play a role in the boardroom too.

Instead of allowing emotion to cloud reasoned argument, disagreement should not always be considered disloyalty, it should instead be viewed as an attempt to improve an organisation.

Robert joined the HRreview editorial team in October 2015. After graduating from the University of Salford in 2009 with a BA in Politics, Robert has spent several years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past he has been part of editorial teams at Flux Magazine, Mondo*Arc Magazine and The Marine Professional.

Latest news

Govt unveils visa support scheme to help scale-ups hire global talent

Fast-growing firms will receive visa fee support and recruitment assistance under plans designed to help businesses attract international talent and expand.

Employment tribunal roundup: Disability testing, discrimination evidence, procedural fairness and training access

Recent EAT rulings examine disability discrimination, religion and belief claims, procedural fairness and access to workplace training opportunities.

Half of grieving workers handle ‘death admin’ during work hours, study finds

Many bereaved employees are managing probate, pensions and financial paperwork during working hours, with four in five saying it affects their ability to work.

Lauren Webb: Empowering women to lead the way in analytics and AI

Women remain wildly underrepresented in technical and digital leadership, making up just 22% of the UK’s AI talent. It’s jarring.
- Advertisement -

Employers urged to balance flexibility and fairness as England’s World Cup campaign begins

Employment lawyers are advising organisations to plan ahead for leave requests and workplace flexibility as the 2026 FIFA World Cup gets under way.

Amy Coleman on uncertainty and pressure at work

“Many of you shared feelings of uncertainty and pressure as the work evolves.”

Must read

Maria Rechkemmer: In an AI world, human language still leads – why multilingual teams are a business imperative

In an era defined by AI and rapid digital transformation, it’s easy to assume that human language skills might fade into the background. But quite the opposite is true.

Five ways apprenticeships have changed over time

Apprenticeships are fundamentally about combining working, learning, and earning. For young people this is an attractive combination, and this should be the case for employers too. It’s encouraging to see so many businesses already on board with Apprenticeships – understanding their value and impact – but there are still some that are yet to experience their benefits.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you