HRreview 20 Years
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Subscribe for weekday HR news, opinion and advice.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Eleanor Rogers: Strike season and childcare – how to come out on top

-

shutterstock_57670474

The latest tube strike may have been called off, but there is another strike planned just around the corner. This time, teachers plan to walk out on 26 March over pay, pensions and conditions. They blame Michael Gove’s persistent refusal to address their complaints.

In the past we have seen that teachers’ strikes can be potentially more disruptive than strikes in other unionised workplaces. In June 2011, teachers and civil servants in the UK took strike action and reportedly, many employers suffered from the fall out, as some working parents were unable to make alternative childcare arrangements. This resulted in parents missing work to stay at home and look after their children. So, how should employers treat staff who need to take time off to care for their children or deal with unexpected leave?

As with any unforeseen circumstances, a degree of flexibility and common sense is required on both sides if employers and their employees are to limit the disruption.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

If alternative child care arrangements cannot be made, in most cases employers would be ill-advised to refuse a working parent the day off. This is because employed parents have the statutory right to reasonable unpaid time off to care for dependants when there has been an unexpected disruption or breakdown of child care arrangements and the leave is necessary to deal with that disruption of breakdown of arrangements. The right also applies if the child is ill, injured, dies or is involved in an unexpected incident at school. The right only applies to employees – irrespective of their length of service, or whether they work full-time or part-time or are employed on a permanent, temporary or fixed-term basis. It does not apply to workers or the self-employed. The amount of time off that the employee can take is limited to the amount of time which is needed to deal with the “crisis”.  Employees should give their employers notice of the reason for the absence as soon as reasonably practicable and let them know how long they expect to be away from work, otherwise the statutory right does not apply.

In this instance we have been given good notice of the strike, so couldn’t we argue that it was not unexpected?

Unfortunately not. In a case with Royal Bank of Scotland Plc and its employee, the EAT (employment appeals tribunal) considered whether there was an “unexpected” disruption to child-care arrangements when an employee had two weeks’ notice that her child minder would be unavailable. The EAT confirmed that the word “unexpected” does not involve a time element – it is unexpected at the moment the employee learns of it. In this case, the employee took reasonable steps to find alternative care, but failed, so the leave was necessary. Had she not taken reasonable steps, then the employer could have argued that the time off was not necessary and therefore did not fall within the definition and she was not entitled to time off.

Working parents should not suffer a detriment (such as disciplinary action for being absent) for exercising their statutory right. In a different case with Credit Resource Solutions, an employment tribunal found that the employee was subjected to a detriment when he had one hour’s pay deducted, even though he was only away for half an hour to make emergency childcare arrangements. He was also unfairly dismissed, as this was linked to his exercising his statutory rights. The case highlights the need for policies to be implemented carefully, so that decision makers and managers have a clear understanding of them and can then use them effectively and fairly.  In another case with Npower Ltd, its employee was awarded £1,000 when she was subjected to first stage disciplinary action for having taken time off under the company’s leave policy.

To limit the disruption further strike action may bring, consider the following:

  • Consider your dependant leave policies – are they up to date, sufficiently clear and fit for purpose
  • Make sure that all involved are aware of their rights and obligations under the dependant leave policies
  • Inform your workforce of planned strikes, so that they can start to make childcare arrangements
  • Ensure that the policy is enforced equally for all employees.

Eleanor Rogers is an employment lawyer at UK’s largest employment law firm, Doyle Clayton. For further advice contact Eleanor Rogers on 020 7329 9090 or at [email protected]

Latest news

Felicia Williams: Why ‘shadow work’ is quietly breaking your people strategy

Employees are losing seven hours a week to tasks that fall outside their core job description. For HR leaders, that’s the kind of stat that keeps you up at night.

Redundancies rise as 327,000 job losses forecast for 2026

UK job losses are set to rise again as redundancy warnings hit post-pandemic highs, with employers cutting roles amid rising costs and economic pressure.

Rise of ‘sickfluencers’ and AI advice sparks concern over attitudes to work

Online influencers and AI tools are shaping how people approach illness and employment, heaping pressure on employers.

‘Silent killer’ dust linked to 500 construction deaths a year as 600,000 workers face exposure

Hundreds of UK construction workers die each year from silica dust exposure as a new campaign calls for stronger workplace protections.
- Advertisement -

Leaders ‘overestimate’ how much workers use AI

Firms may be misreading workforce readiness for artificial intelligence, as frontline staff report far lower day-to-day adoption than executives expect.

Cost-of-living pressures ‘keep unhappy workers in their jobs’

Many say economic pressures are forcing them to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, as pay and financial stability dominate career decisions.

Must read

Joanne Skilton: HR trends to watch out for in 2021

"There’s no doubt that policies need to be altered as we move into the new working world, but what exactly are the HR trends that will shape the future of employee experience?"

Richard Seville: Supporting mental wellbeing in the workplace

In light of Mental Health Awareness Week, Richard Seville, Senior HR Manager at P&G, explains how P&G is committing to supporting mental wellbeing in the workplace.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you