Young people lose more than £6,000 a year due to wage discrimination

-

A new report by Young Women’s Trust shows that under-25s are missing out on between £820 and £6,300 a year because they are not entitled to the legal ‘National Living Wage’.

The charity, which supports young women on low or no pay, found that more than a million young people are being paid as much as £3.45 an hour less for doing the same jobs as older workers, despite having the same responsibilities and the same outgoings. Over the course of a year, they are losing out on £6,279. The findings come after a major survey for Young Women’s Trust showed that half of young people are struggling financially, a quarter said they are in debt all of the time and one in three put their anxiety down to their money situation.

Despite paying lower wages, employers say young people are as valuable to the workplace as older workers. Four in five employers in a YouGov poll for the charity said that young people contribute as much as or more than older people to their workplaces. 79 per cent said young people should be paid the same as older people for the same work, suggesting support for extending the National Living Wage to under-25s is strong among employers.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Young Women’s Trust’s report, ‘Paid Less, Worth Less?’, also found that apprentices are some of the hardest hit financially. The legal apprentice minimum wage of £3.50 an hour falls far short of the Government’s £7.50 National Living Wage, leaving them £7,280 a year worse off than workers aged 25 and over. Young Women’s Trust has found that, in some cases, apprentices are given the same work and responsibilities as non-trainee workers and are being exploited.

A survey of more than 4,000 young people by the charity found that the two most popular policies were raising the apprentice minimum wage (supported by 83 per cent) and introducing equal pay for equal work by extending the National Living Wage to under-25s (79 per cent). This was more popular than abolishing university tuition fees, which was supported by 59 per cent of respondents.

As well as getting lower wages on the basis of age alone, under-25s who are job-seeking are entitled to less financial support than their older counterparts and Housing Benefit for 18 to 21 year-olds has been scrapped.

Young Women’s Trust chief executive Dr Carole Easton OBE said:

“Politicians are increasingly asking themselves how they can win young people’s votes. It’s time they started asking young people. Young people are telling us day-in, day-out, that they are struggling to make ends meet. They are falling into debt, using foodbanks in greater numbers and their self-confidence is low. It’s no surprise when they are paid less for the same work.

“We all need a basic amount of money to get by, no matter how old we are. The bus to work costs the same, whether you’re 24 or 26. Gas and electricity costs the same, regardless of age. Rent doesn’t cost any less in your early 20s.

“Much more needs to be done to improve young people’s prospects and give them hope for the future. This means giving them the right skills and support to find jobs, ensuring decent and flexible jobs are available, significantly increasing the apprentice minimum wage and changing the law to ensure under-25s are entitled to the same National Living Wage as everyone else. This would benefit businesses and the economy too.”

Young Women’s Trust advisory panel member Nia, 26, from Cardiff, said:

“When I started work, I was working in a café and because I was under 25 I was paid a lower minimum wage. It was exactly the same job and exactly the same number of hours as the older people I worked with, but at the end of the day I was taking home less money.

“People under the age of 25 have to buy food, travel to work and pay bills like everyone else.   We are working hard like everyone else. And I didn’t suddenly gain a lot more experience on my 25th birthday!

“More than a million young people are earning less than the National Living Wage and are struggling like I was. It’s time for action.”

Young Women’s Trust has today launched a campaign alongside its report to persuade the Government to extend the National Living Wage to under-25s.

Rebecca joined the HRreview editorial team in January 2016. After graduating from the University of Sheffield Hallam in 2013 with a BA in English Literature, Rebecca has spent five years working in print and online journalism in Manchester and London. In the past she has been part of the editorial teams at Sleeper and Dezeen and has founded her own arts collective.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Hannah Robbins: To what extent are your off the record discussions with employees protected?

Off the record discussions or protected conversations have played a significant role in employer-employee exit negotiations since they became inadmissible in unfair dismissal proceedings on the 29th July 2013, but not every conversation is automatically protected. To what extent can employers genuinely have an off the record discussion?

Blind recruitment is much more than a name

Leading organisations increasingly view diversity as a key influencer...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you