Smokers cost companies £4,000 more to employ annually

-

smokingA new study, published in the journal, Tobacco Control, has claimed that smokers cost approximately £4,000 a year more to employ than non-smokers.

Researchers in America say their calculations show that that time off work costs employers the equivalent of £344 a year per smoker, lower productivity costs £307 and smoking breaks cost £2,045.

Commenting on the study, researchers from the College of Public Health and Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, said:

“Employees who smoke impose significant excess costs on private employers. The results of this study may help inform employer decisions about tobacco-related policies.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It has been revealed that some US companies have even started to charge smokers higher premiums for employee health insurance, while others claim they will dismiss employees who do not quit smoking within a specific time period.

US researchers continued:

“It is important to remember that the costs imposed by tobacco use are not simply financial costs.

“It is not possible to put a price on the lost lives and the human suffering caused by smoking. The desire to help one’s employees lead healthier and longer lives should provide an additional impetus for employers to work towards eliminating tobacco from the workplace.”

According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), it is not unlawful for UK employers to advertise jobs as only available to non-smokers, and employers can deduct time spent smoking at work and not engaged with duties from an employee’s salary.

In response to the new report, Simon Clark, Director of the consumer group, Forest, which lobbies for the rights of smokers, said that smoking should not be a factor when it comes to employing people.

He said:

“This study trots out the usual estimates and calculations. Yes, smoking is a risk to people’s health but so is obesity, drinking to excess and lack of exercise.

“Many smokers believe the occasional smoking break improves rather than reduces their productivity. This is just another attempt to stigmatise smokers and encourage employers to discriminate against them.”

He added:

“Non-smokers take coffee breaks, make personal phone calls and use social media at work. Should those activities be targeted too?

“Smoking should not be a factor when it comes to employing people. People should be judged on their ability to do the job, not on whether they smoke.”

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Alex Wilke: How a Chief Feedback Officer can improve employee feedback

Collecting and acting on feedback from employees and customers is becoming essential to successful business decision making, prompting discussions about the emergence of a new board level representative – the Chief Feedback Officer – to take control of the area.  What’s behind this idea and what exactly would someone with that job title do anyway?

Derek Kelly: Handling HR disputes with contractors and freelancers

First things first, allow me to be clear. Contractors...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you