Smokers cost companies £4,000 more to employ annually

-

smokingA new study, published in the journal, Tobacco Control, has claimed that smokers cost approximately £4,000 a year more to employ than non-smokers.

Researchers in America say their calculations show that that time off work costs employers the equivalent of £344 a year per smoker, lower productivity costs £307 and smoking breaks cost £2,045.

Commenting on the study, researchers from the College of Public Health and Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, said:

“Employees who smoke impose significant excess costs on private employers. The results of this study may help inform employer decisions about tobacco-related policies.”

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

It has been revealed that some US companies have even started to charge smokers higher premiums for employee health insurance, while others claim they will dismiss employees who do not quit smoking within a specific time period.

US researchers continued:

“It is important to remember that the costs imposed by tobacco use are not simply financial costs.

“It is not possible to put a price on the lost lives and the human suffering caused by smoking. The desire to help one’s employees lead healthier and longer lives should provide an additional impetus for employers to work towards eliminating tobacco from the workplace.”

According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), it is not unlawful for UK employers to advertise jobs as only available to non-smokers, and employers can deduct time spent smoking at work and not engaged with duties from an employee’s salary.

In response to the new report, Simon Clark, Director of the consumer group, Forest, which lobbies for the rights of smokers, said that smoking should not be a factor when it comes to employing people.

He said:

“This study trots out the usual estimates and calculations. Yes, smoking is a risk to people’s health but so is obesity, drinking to excess and lack of exercise.

“Many smokers believe the occasional smoking break improves rather than reduces their productivity. This is just another attempt to stigmatise smokers and encourage employers to discriminate against them.”

He added:

“Non-smokers take coffee breaks, make personal phone calls and use social media at work. Should those activities be targeted too?

“Smoking should not be a factor when it comes to employing people. People should be judged on their ability to do the job, not on whether they smoke.”

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

Armin Hopp: Should employees choose their own development opportunities?

Staff churn is a costly exercise and disruptive to business and customer service. Employee desire to change jobs can be due to a number of complex factors but there is no doubt that learning opportunities ranging from vocational skills through to soft skills such as language and communications competencies can help to create and maintain employee loyalty and drive richer career development opportunities throughout the organisation.

Jo Taylor: What is the difference between recruitment and resourcing?

Jo Taylor, Head of Resourcing and Talent Management” at...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you