HSE confirms October launch date for cost recovery scheme

-

The HSE has today confirmed that its cost recovery scheme, Fee for Intervention (FFI), will start on 1 October 2012 subject to Parliamentary approval.

FFI recovers costs from those who break health and safety laws for the time and effort HSE spends helping to put matters right such as, investigating and taking enforcement action, but according to the HSE “law-abiding businesses will be free from costs and will not pay a fee”.

Gordon MacDonald, HSE’s Programme Director, said:

“Confirming the date for the start of Fee For Intervention and publishing the guidance will give duty-holders clarity and certainty about the start of the scheme and what they can expect.

HRreview Logo

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“We have worked with industry representatives in shaping the final form of the scheme and the published guidance explains how the scheme will work and what businesses can do to comply with the law and avoid incurring a fee.

“It is right that those who break the law should pay their fair share of the costs to put things right – and not the public purse. Firms who manage workplace risks properly will not pay.”

The HSE Board recommended the introduction of FFI to ministers in December 2011 and the HSE has completed a successful test run of the scheme in preparation for its start in October.

New, detailed guidance developed in consultation with representatives from industry has been published on HSE’s website setting out how the FFI scheme will work in practice and including examples illustrating how it would be applied.

Latest news

Helen Wada: Why engagement initiatives fail without human-centric leadership

Workforce engagement has become a hot topic across the boardroom and beyond, particularly as hybrid working practices have become the norm.

Recruiters warned to move beyond ‘post and pray’ as passive talent overlooked

Employers risk missing most candidates by relying on job boards as hiring methods struggle to deliver quality applicants.

Employment tribunal roundup: Appeal fairness, dismissal reasoning, discrimination tests and religious belief clarified

Decisions examine appeal failures, dismissal reasoning, discrimination claims and religious belief, offering practical guidance on fairness, causation and proportionality.

Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’ as employers urged to rethink assessments

Employers may be overstating concerns about AI misuse in recruitment as evidence of candidate manipulation remains limited.
- Advertisement -

More employees use workplace health benefits, but barriers still limit access

Many workers struggle to access employer healthcare support due to confusion, costs and unclear processes.

Gender pay gap in tech widens to nine-year high as AI roles drive salaries

Women in IT earn less as salaries rise faster in male-dominated AI and cybersecurity roles, widening pay differences.

Must read

A champion failure: what athletics can teach us about regulatory culture

The World Athletics Championships recently ended, but one of its defining moments will have people talking for some time. Darren Maw discusses what athletics can teach us about regulatory culture.

Dr. Lynda Shaw: Why gender should not matter

Historically, we have lived in a patriarchal society where men dominated the business world and women fought to be recognised as equals. Some may argue that positive discrimination towards women then came into play, but in this day and age simple focus on talent, experience and personality should trump any gender bias to generate success for businesses.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you